You are not logged in. Please register or login.

monkeychow
 Rep: 661 

Re: The Star Wars Thread *NO SPOILERS ALLOWED!*

monkeychow wrote:

As for relationships.

Hidden Text:

I'm torn.

As I said above - if she has no relationships she's awkwardly powerful.

Basically i'm ok with people being Skywalkers. As the saga is about the Skywalker family - and it was established from Day 1 that 'the force runs strong in my family' or whatever. This gives anyone who is a skywalker a reason to be involved in the greater history of the galaxy.

When it gets lame is when other characters relatives get involved.

An example - in the prequels I forget the specifics but I think Boba Fett had a tad and he was called Jango Fett and was the basis for the clone army or something.

To me this is incredibly unlikely. Like in Empire I thought Boba was just a pro bounty hunter they used. That his father would also be a person of such significance seems unlikely. Like in their whole universe of worlds and galaxies, the same 4 or 5 families across every generation alter history. it's hard to believe.

It makes plot sense with the skywalkers cos of their blood line powers. But its awkward if Han's grandad was the guy who invented blasters, and Greedo's uncle invented hyperspace or something. Its a galaxy of billions of people. You think some other fresh people would get involved.

So i'm in a hypocritical place.

Generally I think, other than for Skywalkers, is better for people to be fresh families than have some loose relationship to previous character lines. However in the case of Rey - they made her so absurdly powerful so early - that I feel it needs some type of justification in the plot more than what we've been given. A family relationship would do that. But so would some other prophecy or something. There just needs to be some reason other than the producers keenness to show girls are just as good jedi. Because then it would be bad writing.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: The Star Wars Thread *NO SPOILERS ALLOWED!*

misterID wrote:

Just got back from watching it. And I'm torn. The opening was terribly lame. I honestly thought it was a parody film before the actual feature started. The acting was over the top. It went from Scarry Nazi types in TFA to Dracula meets the three stooges. Kylo and Rey sold the whole thing and brought it home for me. An epic relationship that makes the male female protagonist/antagonist work, the rest was filler, IMO. I'm glad JJ is coming back. It was good but a big letdown.

Hidden Text:

Finn should have died. I fucking hate that character. A complete waste of time and THE reason it was thirty minutes too long. I don't care about him or his fat token Asian girlfriend.

It took MASSIVE balls to take out Snoke like that. Impressive.

So happy the big secret behind Rey's parents is that they were lowlife degenerates with nothing special about them.

Back from the dead, space flying Leia was all kinds of unintentional hilarity. What shit.

Luke was half cool, half tool. Still trying to make my mind up about which.

Yoda was a throwaway. Meant nothing except to bring back Empire Yoda for us geeks.

Still processing...

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: The Star Wars Thread *NO SPOILERS ALLOWED!*

misterID wrote:

After thinking on it more, my feeling is Johnson just wrote a shitty script. It looked great, but he had no idea what he was doing. I'm shocked with how idiosyncratic Kennedy has been with this franchise that she would have allowed this to happen. They should have gotten Matt Reeves.

How no one seems to have an issue with Luke's reaction to getting the lightsaber that was so awesomely set up in TFA is absolutely astounding. How could you fuck that up?

monkeychow
 Rep: 661 

Re: The Star Wars Thread *NO SPOILERS ALLOWED!*

monkeychow wrote:

Yeah, I mean I enjoyed it a lot to be honest, its a great fun time at the movies.

But the thing that surprised me was how the story really felt disconnected from the previous movie. TFA had given me the real sense of an over arching plan - but TLJ really feels more like they are making it up as they go.

This movie really seemed to kinda keep bits it liked and discard elements it wasn't interested in. Right down to moving the scar on Kylo's face.

I'm really hopeful about Episode 9 though. JJ is back - which I think should provide some consistency.

PaSnow
 Rep: 205 

Re: The Star Wars Thread *NO SPOILERS ALLOWED!*

PaSnow wrote:
misterID wrote:

It looked great, but he had no idea what he was doing.

I wanna watch it again but I do agree with these type sentiments. It was dark, and industrial. I felt that was better than TFA as the was a little too polished & Star Trek reboot-y. However the story didn't go hand in hand with the first installment, felt sorta seperate with little arc from 1-3.

Looking back it almost 'looked' more like a sequel to Rogue One than TFA, and while cool, I don't know if it was a fit without a more fitting story.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: The Star Wars Thread *NO SPOILERS ALLOWED!*

misterID wrote:
monkeychow wrote:

Yeah, I mean I enjoyed it a lot to be honest, its a great fun time at the movies.

But the thing that surprised me was how the story really felt disconnected from the previous movie. TFA had given me the real sense of an over arching plan - but TLJ really feels more like they are making it up as they go.

This movie really seemed to kinda keep bits it liked and discard elements it wasn't interested in. Right down to moving the scar on Kylo's face.

I'm really hopeful about Episode 9 though. JJ is back - which I think should provide some consistency.

This ^^


There were really enjoyable moments. The battle with Snoke's guards was awesome. And I would've enjoyed more of the visual spectacle had I watched it in 3D.

buzzsaw
 Rep: 423 

Re: The Star Wars Thread *NO SPOILERS ALLOWED!*

buzzsaw wrote:

Saw it for the third time today.  It's still not the movie I would have made, but I have certainly come to grips with it.  I think there are certainly some continuity issues, but the opportunity is there for it to be fixed by the end of the trilogy.  I really think we won't be able to judge the movie until we see IX.  In JJ I trust...

Aussie
 Rep: 287 

Re: The Star Wars Thread *NO SPOILERS ALLOWED!*

Aussie wrote:

As a stand alone movie it was superficially entertaining, but as a Star Wars movie I thought it was very poorly written and a disappointment.

The fact that there was never a broad outline for the story of all 3 of these movies shows badly.  The lack of continuity and meaningful character development just one example of this.

Hidden Text:

The fact that Luke Skywalker dies and I bet you not a tear was shed by anybody in the theatre when it happened. Luke, you know the guy who this whole franchise has predominantly been about since the beginning.  Yet its so poorly written that his death doesn't evoke any emotions or feelings in the viewer.

There are so many annoying points about this film (largely already mentioned so I won't rehash them).  But I think Kathleen Kennedy is ruining the whole thing with her feminist and other associated agendas.  That's being put ahead of meaningful writing. I think it's great having strong female characters (I want to see strong female role models for my daughter), but who is the strong male role?  Poe was reduced to a bumbling pig headed buffoon and Finn, well he kinda was barely in the movie except for the pointless casino side story.

Also the whole Mary Sue thing wth Rey is quite irritating.  How she can do what she does without any training in TFA and this essentially carried through into TLJ.  It also means there is no real character development left for her.

Don't even get me started on The Force and what can be done with it now.  I thought it was questionable when Kylo was able to stop a blaster shot in mid air in TFA.  Well shit that looks entirely realistic compared to what is done with it now with little to no training.

bigbri
 Rep: 341 

Re: The Star Wars Thread *NO SPOILERS ALLOWED!*

bigbri wrote:

Aussie, I’m not picking on you here, because I’ve seen this complaint a lot.

But The Force is an imaginary magical power. We’ve already accepted it as a thing in these movies, but how could we know the limits to this imaginary force?

Aussie
 Rep: 287 

Re: The Star Wars Thread *NO SPOILERS ALLOWED!*

Aussie wrote:

Yeah that's true, I just feel it was better when there appeared to be some limitations to the force.  At the moment the only limitations to it appear to be imagination.

Maybe it's the fact that apparently "amateurs" in regards to experience with the force are able to do such fantastic things with little to no training.

Whilst Leia has obviously been around force users for years and it's in her blood, yet her first use of it is for some superman flying in space.  Then Rey effectively defeating Kylo in TFA and other things.  It's probably passable that Luke got to the level to be able to have a a teleport battle using the force, but I preferred it when it was at least a little difficult to use.  Im sure if Anakin was able to use the current version of the force then he would have been able to save Padme's life, the Emperor wouldn't have had to feed him BS about that the Dark Side giving him those powers.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB