You are not logged in. Please register or login.

Re: Led Zeppelin

nugdafied wrote:

Man, I hope they do a tour next year. Would love to see them at The Gorge up in Washington. And yes, lots of time has passed since the 70's, so I would prefer a more laid back set of songs like Going to Cali, Tangerine, etc.....where they could still do with them with grace.

RussTCB
 Rep: 633 

Re: Led Zeppelin

RussTCB wrote:

removed

James
 Rep: 664 

Re: Led Zeppelin

James wrote:

I'm pretty sure he was joking.

The way the songs are being performed isn't much of a shock though. These guys are approaching 70. As mentioned in the thread already, the Stones are a shell of their former shelves. Keith strums a guitar while doing those poses he does while Mick talks the songs.

polluxlm
 Rep: 221 

Re: Led Zeppelin

polluxlm wrote:
Jameslofton wrote:

I'm pretty sure he was joking.

The way the songs are being performed isn't much of a shock though. These guys are approaching 70. As mentioned in the thread already, the Stones are a shell of their former shelves. Keith strums a guitar while doing those poses he does while Mick talks the songs.

But it's still a great show if you're there.

Bootlegs very seldom do bands justice compared to actually being there.

Mikkamakka
 Rep: 217 

Re: Led Zeppelin

Mikkamakka wrote:
Jameslofton wrote:

I'm pretty sure he was joking.

The way the songs are being performed isn't much of a shock though. These guys are approaching 70. As mentioned in the thread already, the Stones are a shell of their former shelves. Keith strums a guitar while doing those poses he does while Mick talks the songs.

I saw them this summer and although I agree that Keith is the worst guitar player alive(? 16), Mick still can sing their songs.

Axl S
 Rep: 112 

Re: Led Zeppelin

Axl S wrote:

Proshot

[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=Hz9V8e1YJgM[/youtube]

Rex
 Rep: 50 

Re: Led Zeppelin

Rex wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZxukPZ0pjA

Kashmir, and this one isn't down-tuned.

IT'S FUCKING AWESOME. 

Plant still has some fire left in 'em.

tejastech08
 Rep: 194 

Re: Led Zeppelin

tejastech08 wrote:
russtcb wrote:
tejastech08 wrote:
russtcb wrote:

All of this sounds OK at best to me.

Yet you love Angel Down. 16

I've never said I love Angel Down. I happen to like the album, but I wouldn't say I love it. Besides what has Sebastian Bach's new album got to do with songs being sung way lower then their recorded?

Nothing really other than the fact that Sebastian Bach is a hack compared to Zeppelin.

Re: Led Zeppelin

tejastech08 wrote:

Nothing really other than the fact that Sebastian Bach is a hack compared to Zeppelin.

Ever seen Sebastian live?  I'd much rather go to one of his shows and watch him do his thing than see some 60 year old farts have a heart attack on stage. hmm

BLS-Pride
 Rep: 212 

Re: Led Zeppelin

BLS-Pride wrote:
Jimmy Zig Zag Bobiadis wrote:
tejastech08 wrote:

Nothing really other than the fact that Sebastian Bach is a hack compared to Zeppelin.

Ever seen Sebastian live?  I'd much rather go to one of his shows and watch him do his thing than see some 60 year old farts have a heart attack on stage. hmm

That's just retarded. Its Led fucking Zeppelin. And judging by the boots those "old farts" can still rock the fuck out.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB