You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: Axl Rose/Dexter forum chat discussion thread
Yeah, I don't think there's anyway he'll post here. I think this is strictly for the sites that sold out and Axl chatting is their payoff. At least that's how it looks.
I think we should keep our questions and give them to Bumble to get Axl to answer. That's as close as we're going to get to talk to Axl
Or go register over there, and post. I've still got an account at HTGTH, and it'd take me about 6 seconds to get back into MyGNR.
- R.B. Huckleberry
- Rep: 2
Re: Axl Rose/Dexter forum chat discussion thread
How does a fan site "sell out"?
- R.B. Huckleberry
- Rep: 2
Re: Axl Rose/Dexter forum chat discussion thread
R.B. Huckleberry wrote:How does a fan site "sell out"?
By censoring everyone's opinions because they think the band won't like it.
Go to a music gear forum. Then tell me how bad CD.com, mygnr & HTGTH are.
- tejastech08
- Rep: 194
Re: Axl Rose/Dexter forum chat discussion thread
LOL at Axl using the emoticons. He's a forum nerd now! BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Re: Axl Rose/Dexter forum chat discussion thread
It may not be, but to deny the fact that MyGNR & HTGTH heavily censor to KISS THE ASS of the band is undeniable.
They insult the intelligence of Guns N' Roses, they insult the intelligence of Axl and they insult the intelligence of their members.
They are basically telling you "Axl you're too STUPID to handle these questions". They are saying "Regular poster, you're too ignorant to know the right questions to ask".
You can talk all day about how it's no big deal, but the bottom line - it is. Nazis on a power trip controlling and censoring how the fans speak is beyond lame.
I once again want to thank the intelligent posters on those boards that asked good questions. But the trolls and mods have been a joke - like I expected them to be. Asskissers to the 'nth degree.
- monkeychow
- Rep: 661
Re: Axl Rose/Dexter forum chat discussion thread
Did axl end up answering questions about the name? Damn my aussie timezone 
If he wants respectful but challanging questions, I would have asked:
#1: Its been reported that he leveraged the bands fear of another riot to get control of the name by refusing to go on stage till they signed it over. Is that true?
#2: An opinion could suggest the name is a double edged sword. On one hand it provides brand recgonition, on the other it has the potential to distract from the quality of his new work, as the media will focus on the 'ethics' of keeping the name even when the new songs are kickass. What are his thoughts on this? Did he consider it and if so, why has he chosen to keep the name? Is it personal?
