You are not logged in. Please register or login.

Axlin16
 Rep: 768 

Re: Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin

Axlin16 wrote:

What James said. And what Palin says means nothing to me. Same with Biden.


It's Obama & McCain i'm concerned with.

James
 Rep: 664 

Re: Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin

James wrote:
Axlin08 wrote:

It's Obama & McCain i'm concerned with.

You didn't receive the memo? McCain isn't running. Its Obama's vast experience vs Palin's zero experience.

Axlin16
 Rep: 768 

Re: Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin

Axlin16 wrote:
Axl S wrote:
Axlin08 wrote:

[
I need to grow up? I NEED TO GROW UP?


Are you kidding?

I come from a country that's NOT anti-semetic. I come from a country that provides WOMEN rights.  I come from a country that doesn't persecute people because of their religion or kill them because they aren't the right religion. I come from a country that provides MINORITES rights. I come from a country that a GAY man or GAY woman can at least walk down the street (hopefully get married one day), but we're getting there.


AND I NEED TO GROW UP?


That's fuckin' rich. All those cats that don't provide those things, in any of those countries, and still live like it's 50 years ago, and in some places 500... you'll have to excuse me if the word RAG HEAD slips out now and again.

I said you need to grow up because you seem to harbour a bit too much unjust hatred towards the Middle East and that you think nuking countries is a great idea. I can understand doing it in situations like James suggested where it may be the only option left to end a war quickly so that the focus can return to reparing all countires affected. Although I don't like the idea that a country like the US has the right to nuke anyone when they feel  like sad

Yes, but you're underestimating the intelligence of the U.S. What you are thinking, people have thought for YEARS.

Have we nuked anyone? No.

But to have a narrow mind, a simple mindset, and think disabling nuclear arms by the U.S., would lead to world peace is DUMB thinking. The same narrow mindedness that thinks banning guns would end all gun crimes. No it won't. Good, legal gun owners amount to a small fraction of crime, if any.

The U.S. is simply saying "we will defend ourselves when the day comes". DEFEND, being the keyword there. It's IRAN that's basically saying we're gonna do it whether the world likes it or not, and if displaying their missles, and beating their chest, and doing all that shit. Not us.

There's nothing wrong with that to me. What's wrong with saying, if you start shit with us, and drop a bomb on one of our cities, we're going to make a hole, out of what USED to be your country.

For Iran, as the old saying goes, don't start nothin' - ain't gonna be nothin'.

But just because I think the enemy are Rag Heads and anti-semites, doesn't mean I harbor hatred towards the middle east. I don't hate the middle east in any way. I hate the enemy. Just like I hate Krauts, Frogs, Gooks, etc. I don't hate Germany, France or Vietnam.

Nuclear arms are a necessary evil imo. I don't want to see innocent people die, but if innocent Americans die in an attack, then we have to counter. Casualties of War.

estrangedpaul
 Rep: 5 

Re: Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin

The answers to every question was a different way of saying "we are keeping are options open" or "we'll wait and see what happens". Lol @ keep an eye on Russia - I'm sure Putin is shaking in his boots.

Its a shame that religion is so important in elections in the most powerful country in the world, which means every candidate has to be extremely religious to have a chance of winning. Thankfully, in europe its much less important.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB