You are not logged in. Please register or login.

Wilco
 Rep: 1 

Re: Which was worse: 1995-1999 or 2002-2006?

Wilco wrote:

Which of the two major periods of silence would you say was worse:

The period from 1995 til when OMG dropped in late 1999?

Or the period from the cancellation of the Chi Dem tour in December 2002 to the massive leaks of February 2006?

Both were roughly 3/4 years of mostly nothingness except rumor and innuendo, but which was worse in your opinion?

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: Which was worse: 1995-1999 or 2002-2006?

misterID wrote:

02-06. There was so much unknown and it ended so spectacularly fucking awfully. There was only bad news. No growing mystique like the 90s. I think I was more invested in CD and those were dark times.

FlashFlood
 Rep: 55 

Re: Which was worse: 1995-1999 or 2002-2006?

FlashFlood wrote:

I was only around for 02-06. I got into GnR when I was in 8th grade in 2001. I was aware of GnR because of the 90s when MTV played November Rain nonstop. I loved the old band but grew intrigued by the mystique Axl had built up with nu-guns. I was in 9th grade when they did the VMAs and was over the moon. Thought Axl was going to take the world over and then Philly happened. The only saving grace for 02-06 was leaks.

Edit: at least in the late 90s you had the Spin or Rolling Stone article teasing new song titles for the first time.

ClaudeF
 Rep: 16 

Re: Which was worse: 1995-1999 or 2002-2006?

ClaudeF wrote:

02 - 06 because we became optimistic.

James
 Rep: 664 

Re: Which was worse: 1995-1999 or 2002-2006?

James wrote:

2002-06 because fans really expected album(s).

The late 90s....while fans wanted an album...it was obvious nothing was happening.

Re: Which was worse: 1995-1999 or 2002-2006?

Sky Dog wrote:

Ditto…from Rio 2001 to 2002, we had songs and strong talk from Axl and Team Brazil about an album.

2002 to 2006 was just painful…

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB