You are not logged in. Please register or login.

Randall Flagg
 Rep: 139 

Re: US Politics Thread

What is your source on that Flynn claim?  Is this another Mother Jones source?  Nothing on Drudge, Fox, MSNBC or CNN. Nothing on the NYT or WP.


None of these credible sources have a mention of this. And you're already sold. Do you not see a problem in your confidence?


Edit:  looks like it originated from the WSJ, but the full article is behind a paywall for me.  It's interesting that Democrats and Republicans have declined said offer for immunity.  You'd think if Flynn had anything to offer someone would be interested, especially if it's harmful to Trump. I'm excited to see where this goes.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
slcpunk wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

Your disdain for Trump is valid. Your belief in a Putin coordinated conspiracy is just looney tunes.

There you go again, always trying to change the subject....Flagg is more interested in talking about posters and insulting them because he's weak on facts.

Conspiracy? His administration is currently under investigation. No conclusion has been made yet, but all things point to some sort of collusion with Russia. It's only getting worse and worse.

So either Obama spied on Trump, or Obama didn't do anything about it when Comey wanted to inform us about Trump. Which one is it?


Quit being disingenuous.  No one is claiming Obama spied on Trump.

Trump-Tweet-Wiretap-Obama-McCarthyism-e1488646092423.jpg

ny-twitter-jpg

Randall Flagg
 Rep: 139 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
slcpunk wrote:

There you go again, always trying to change the subject....Flagg is more interested in talking about posters and insulting them because he's weak on facts.

Conspiracy? His administration is currently under investigation. No conclusion has been made yet, but all things point to some sort of collusion with Russia. It's only getting worse and worse.

So either Obama spied on Trump, or Obama didn't do anything about it when Comey wanted to inform us about Trump. Which one is it?


Quit being disingenuous.  No one is claiming Obama spied on Trump.

http://s4.legalinsurrection.com/wp-cont … 092423.jpg

https://www.svtstatic.se/image-cms/svts … witter-jpg


What did Trump say after that?   Come on, you can do it.

Please explain the evidence of Trump working with Russia. Don't ignore the point none of you can defend.

I'm going to respond to everything SLC says until he answers. He made a claim. Defend it. This is the new MO. Argue until backed into a corner then switch to something different. Obama didn't wiretap Trump. We're all in agreement. So please back to the wild claims of Trump being in bed with Putin.

slcpunk
 Rep: 149 

Re: US Politics Thread

slcpunk wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

What is your source on that Flynn claim?  Is this another Mother Jones source?  .

WSJ... stooge.


Mike Flynn Offers to Testify in Exchange for Immunity

Former national security adviser tells FBI, the House and Senate intelligence committees he’s willing to be interviewed in exchange for deal, officials say

WASHINGTON—Mike Flynn, President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser, has told the Federal Bureau of Investigation and congressional officials investigating the Trump campaign’s potential ties to Russia that he is willing to be interviewed in exchange for a grant of immunity from prosecution, according to officials with knowledge of the matter.

As an adviser to Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign, and later one of Mr. Trump’s top aides in the White House, Mr. Flynn was privy to some of the most sensitive foreign-policy deliberations of the new administration and was directly involved in discussions about the possible lifting of sanctions on Russia imposed by the Obama administration.

He has made the offer to the FBI and the House and Senate intelligence committees through his lawyer but has so far found no takers, the officials said.

Mr. Flynn’s attorney, Robert Kelner, declined to comment.

It wasn’t clear if Mr. Flynn had offered to talk about specific aspects of his time working for Mr. Trump, but the fact that he was seeking immunity suggested Mr. Flynn feels he may be in legal jeopardy following his brief stint as the national security adviser, one official said.

Mr. Flynn was forced to resign after acknowledging that he misled White House officials about the nature of his phone conversations with the Russian ambassador to the U.S. during the presidential transition.

Mr. Flynn’s communications with the Russian ambassador, Sergei Kislyak, have been scrutinized by the FBI, which is examining whether Trump campaign personnel colluded with Russian officials who are alleged to have interfered with the presidential election, according to current and former U.S. officials. Russia has denied the allegations.

Mr. Flynn also was paid tens of thousands of dollars by three Russian companies, including the state-sponsored media network RT, for speeches he made shortly before he became a formal adviser to Mr. Trump’s campaign, according to documents obtained by a congressional oversight committee.

Democratic lawmakers have requested a copy of the security-clearance form that Mr. Flynn was required to file before joining Mr. Trump in the White House, to see if he disclosed sources of foreign income.


And they have asked the Defense Department to investigate whether Mr. Flynn, a retired Army general, violated the Constitution’s emoluments clause by accepting money from RT, which U.S. intelligence officials say is part of a state-funded media apparatus.

—Aruna Viswanatha contributed to this article.

Randall Flagg
 Rep: 139 

Re: US Politics Thread

slcpunk wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

Quit being disingenuous.  No one is claiming Obama spied on Trump.

They're not? That's funny.

Randall Flagg wrote:

Comey wanted to inform us that Russia was actively working to impact our election by smearing Clinton.

Yes, but you're leaving out the other half of that equation. You're cherry picking that,and ignoring the rest of the article. You must accept the information in its entirety, not just what you like.

Randall Flagg wrote:

There's a difference between being a skeptic and someone who will believe anything about someone they dislike. You clearly fall into the latter, and all your diversions and interpretations of others opinions doesn't change that.

Again. Make a point without personally talking about me, Mitch, Snow, ID...whoever. You're incapable of doing that. You constantly misquote articles, posters you disagree with and even yourself when needed.


Quoted so SLC can't ignore this.  Answer the question.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

What is your source on that Flynn claim?  Is this another Mother Jones source?  Nothing on Drudge, Fox, MSNBC or CNN. Nothing on the NYT or WP.


None of these credible sources have a mention of this. And you're already sold. Do you not see a problem in your confidence?


Edit:  looks like it originated from the WSJ, but the full article is behind a paywall for me.  It's interesting that Democrats and Republicans have declined said offer for immunity.  You'd think if Flynn had anything to offer someone would be interested, especially if it's harmful to Trump. I'm excited to see where this goes.

Just Google Mike Flynn.  Karma, it is a bitch.

slcpunk
 Rep: 149 

Re: US Politics Thread

slcpunk wrote:
misterID wrote:

Just Google Mike Flynn.  Karma, it is a bitch.

It's delicious...Flagg back to Hillary supporter in 3...2...


slcpunk
 Rep: 149 

Re: US Politics Thread

slcpunk wrote:

Maybe he'll fall on the sword like Ollie North, and the right will hold him up like some sort of poster boy American hero? Years later he can get a gig on Fox News.

Randall Flagg
 Rep: 139 

Re: US Politics Thread

slcpunk wrote:
misterID wrote:

Just Google Mike Flynn.  Karma, it is a bitch.

It's delicious...Flagg back to Hillary supporter in 3...2...



Answer the question.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
misterID wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

Quit being disingenuous.  No one is claiming Obama spied on Trump.

http://s4.legalinsurrection.com/wp-cont … 092423.jpg

https://www.svtstatic.se/image-cms/svts … witter-jpg


What did Trump say after that?   Come on, you can do it.

Please explain the evidence of Trump working with Russia. Don't ignore the point none of you can defend.

I'm going to respond to everything SLC says until he answers. He made a claim. Defend it. This is the new MO. Argue until backed into a corner then switch to something different. Obama didn't wiretap Trump. We're all in agreement. So please back to the wild claims of Trump being in bed with Putin.

You want me to quote Trump after he stepped in shit? He actually refused to answer any questions about his claims. I think he's in the tank with Russia. You want physical evidence produced on your doorstep for anything you don't like. No one has an obligation to you, RF. If you disagree, disagree, don't be a child about it. I have no evidence Rudy collaborated with the FBI to leak Hillary info when he bragged before hand something big was about to drop... I just know he did.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB