You are not logged in. Please register or login.

bigbri
 Rep: 341 

Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread

bigbri wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
bigbri wrote:

In case we forgot, Trump really doesn't think much of the 1st Amendment.

https://thinkprogress.org/trump-first-a … .a3lk00otk

“They’re all talking about it so wonderfully because, you know, it’s called ‘freedom of the press,’ where you buy magazines and they tell you how to make these same bombs that I saw” Trump said. “They tell you how to make bombs. We should arrest the people that do that because they’re participating in crime. Instead they say ‘oh no you can’t do anything, that’s freedom of expression.’”


Without questioning the source, some material is illegal.  Child porn for example.  You'll never find someone who loves the 1st Amendment more than me, but where do you draw the line between information and advocating violence?  I think that's what Trump is trying to articulate, and obviously Think Progress isn't going to provide any context.

That's for sure true, all of your points actually. But Trump has expressed disdain for freedom of the press and freedom of speech and freedom to peaceably assemble before. This is just more of those same thoughts. It's unsettling.

His whole interview can be seen here, with full context.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GTRabASaY8

mitchejw
 Rep: 131 

Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread

mitchejw wrote:
slcpunk
 Rep: 149 

Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread

slcpunk wrote:

Looks like Daddy Bush is voting for Hillary.

Have we ever seen a political party do this in our lifetime? Top Republicans voting for Hillary:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 … trump.html

I sure have not. I think this speaks volumes to how dangerous a Trump presidency could be. I commend these Republicans for putting our country ahead of party. Dallas News also endorsed Clinton recently...and they always endorse the GOP.

slashsfro
 Rep: 53 

Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread

slashsfro wrote:
Cramer wrote:

Looks like Daddy Bush is voting for Hillary.

Have we ever seen a political party do this in our lifetime? Top Republicans voting for Hillary:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 … trump.html

I sure have not. I think this speaks volumes to how dangerous a Trump presidency could be. I commend these Republicans for putting our country ahead of party. Dallas News also endorsed Clinton recently...and they always endorse the GOP.

Not a real shock to me.  The Bushes (George Sr. and Barbara) have developed a close relationship with the Clintons.  I'm just kinda surprised it leaked out.

But Trump got the endorsement of Dan Quayle, that's gotta count for something, right?

slcpunk
 Rep: 149 

Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread

slcpunk wrote:
slashsfro wrote:

But Trump got the endorsement of Dan Quayle, that's gotta count for something, right?

Ahem...Trumpe

polluxlm
 Rep: 221 

Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread

polluxlm wrote:

CNN taking it to the next level.

CswSUplUkAAniHe.jpg:large

buzzsaw
 Rep: 423 

Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread

buzzsaw wrote:
Cramer wrote:

Looks like Daddy Bush is voting for Hillary.

Have we ever seen a political party do this in our lifetime? Top Republicans voting for Hillary:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 … trump.html

I sure have not. I think this speaks volumes to how dangerous a Trump presidency could be. I commend these Republicans for putting our country ahead of party. Dallas News also endorsed Clinton recently...and they always endorse the GOP.

They are putting the establishment ahead of the country, that's actually what they are doing. This is nothing but a move to protect their own interests. None of them had an issue with any of the other shit that's been going on, but all of a suddenit's country first when a coincidentally non-establishment candidate wins their nomination?  I don't think so.

polluxlm
 Rep: 221 

Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread

polluxlm wrote:

Trump was endorsed by Jeb's son though. That's hilarious.

slcpunk
 Rep: 149 

Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread

slcpunk wrote:
buzzsaw wrote:

They are putting the establishment ahead of the country, that's actually what they are doing. This is nothing but a move to protect their own interests. None of them had an issue with any of the other shit that's been going on, but all of a suddenit's country first when a coincidentally non-establishment candidate wins their nomination?  I don't think so.

They are against him because he's a dangerous moron. He's ignorant in regards to foreign policy, domestic issues, economics, is a pathological liar, advocates violence, has unrealistic visions in regards to immigration, is a conspiracy nut, is associated with even more vile conspiracy nuts, and would be an absolute danger to this country. Any reasonable human being would disown such a person as their representative.

He's also not a Republican, not even close. He chose that platform because they were weak, easy to exploit, and chock full of rubes. Evangelicals who follow anybody who waves a bible in front of them (Trump of all people) and angry white men who blame their life problems on everyone but themselves (Mexicans, women, gays, liberals, take your pick.)

slcpunk
 Rep: 149 

Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread

slcpunk wrote:

The latest Florida poll has Hillary +5 . However both FL and OH average remain in the margin of error category, as does NC, and NV.

Even without all of those states, Hillary is still sitting at 273 walking in the door.

It's highly unlikely Trump will take these states either, but even if he did he would still lose.

Trump is also whining that the debate is going to be rigged. He knows this is going to be an emperor has no clothes moment and is prepping his followers ahead of time.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB