You are not logged in. Please register or login.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: The Wrestling thread

misterID wrote:

Yeah, I heard the dull response to the match. The only pop would be for a Punk/HHH match, only because of the known real life hatred between the two. And the crowd knows he's just filling in for Punk and he's not getting a title shot. People were chanting "Under-Taker" the moment the lame open contract thing was mentioned by Paul Heymen.

I think the triple threat match would be good, and a whole lot better than what's going to happen. Rumor has it that Vince is going to meet with Punk in Chicago, but I don't see anything coming out of it unless Vince is freaked about the WM card and offers him an incredible deal to show up.

Major sucking point:  Last night they did the EXACT same angle in the True Americans match that they did in the Shield match, with one member screwing over another the exact same way in the SAME show. It's lame. Seriously.

And Bryan is absolutely fucking awful cutting a promo. And Cena has devolved back into his black voice. Man, they need an HBK.

Re: The Wrestling thread

AtariLegend wrote:

Supposedly someone told Meltzer Punk shows up tonight, but Meltzer is not so sure.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: The Wrestling thread

misterID wrote:

and apparantly it's a big name backstage who's saying it.

This could get interesting.

Re: The Wrestling thread

AtariLegend wrote:

Still a chance Punk could show up and screw Bryan tonight and setup a match people actually want to see. Not holding breath though.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: The Wrestling thread

misterID wrote:

It was a good RAW, imo, and only had the matches it had to keep the fans occupied.

I knew Punk was going to show up about halfway through the show. If you noticed, only Paul Heymen mentioned Punk's name. Everyone went out of their way not to say it. That's not a good sign.

Re: The Wrestling thread

AtariLegend wrote:

Bagwell puts himself over.. beyond delusional.

Buff Bagwell was a guest on The Shoot yesterday, which can be heard at this link (the interview begins at the 15 minute mark and ran for 30 minutes). Here are some of the highlights:

John Cena:

"I don't think he's a Rock, I don't think he is a Sting, I don't think he is a Goldberg, I don't think he is a Stone Cold. But I think he's bigger than a Buff Bagwell. I really do. Now mainly because of the way they've pushed him I give him credit than being bigger than me. When you lay out the facts, no he's not as big as The Rock, no he's not as big as Stone Cold, no he's not as big as these other guys I'm talking about. Then again, you give me the same push I think I would be just as big as John Cena. He's not that cornerstone guy. He's not that super mega superstar that The Rock has become. He's not that super mega superstar Stone Cold had become. He's just WWE's number one guy and with a little bit of help, a lot of guys could be that guy. He's just got the look, he's got the ability, and he was at the right place at the right time to be their poster child."

CM Punk:

"He's too small. That's why they kept him and The Rock as far apart as they could until they had to wrestle because when you really stand Rock against CM Punk in the ring. They just don't look like it fits. You've got a 260 pound guy in The Rock down to a buck 80-85 CM Punk. Nothing against being a buck 85 but you know TNA's got a division called the X Division for guys like that. I think that's a good thing to have, but as far as being the World Heavyweight Champion CM Punk should not be. He's not big enough, he don't look the part. He's heard, I bet if you ask him and he told the truth, he's heard a million times wow you're not as big as I thought you were. That's not good for Pro Wrestling. You've gotta be big you know? to make it believable, to make it more realistic. I don't think he's that. He just doesn't carry that kind of power."

Can anything can save TNA?:

"No, I don't think there is. That's why I'm not mad they didn't hire me. Hiring Buff Bagwell isn't going to save TNA. Hiring The Rock isn't going to save TNA. So why put out a couple more hundred grand a year when it's not going to save the company. I understand their position but I still don't understand keeping the show on television. Either shut it down or do hire a Buff Bagwell that may switch the channels a little more, may make something happen. It may make somebody want to come over. Then you got The Rock and Buff Bagwell, maybe a Goldberg on TNA. Now you've got some heavy players. You just can't have match after match people going who's this guy here? what's that guys name? You gotta have name value and they don't.

"They (TNA) were at the Gwinett Center here about 6 months ago, and I just drove up there and walked in. They just ate me up and oh god you look great, looks like you haven't aged a bit, you know all this stuff. Me and Eric did text back and forth and all of sudden guys started getting fired, it was the same ol story, TNA's going under and it was over again. I just can't imagine being in the wrestling business you've got Buff Bagwell living in Atlanta, you're running a Gwinett show which is 20 minutes from my house. Why would you not have Buff Bagwell come in and get beat? Put me on TV, beat me, but why not put me on TV? People know me better than they know other guy they're beating. So why not get a better rating and beat me. I'm not asking to win, I'm asking to be part of the show and help them build a product."

Bagwell also discussed his career change, how it came about and how his wife is dealing with all of it, his contract with Showtime and the Gigolos reality show, what he thinks of Daniel Bryan, and more.

Source: http://www.wrestlinginc.com/wi/news/201 … ast-stars/

Re: The Wrestling thread

AtariLegend wrote:

Hopefully Undertaker announces that he'll induct Paul Bearer tonight  into the HOF and not retirement.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: The Wrestling thread

misterID wrote:

That Buff interview is hilarious. I seriously can't believe that guy is that delusional. The only moment of popularity he ever had was when he teamed up with Scott Steiner. That's the only time I can remember.

Axlin16
 Rep: 768 

Re: The Wrestling thread

Axlin16 wrote:

Anybody doing WWE Network? And if so, what do you think?

BLS-Pride
 Rep: 212 

Re: The Wrestling thread

BLS-Pride wrote:
Axlin12 wrote:

Anybody doing WWE Network? And if so, what do you think?

I heard it was having a few problems. Some ECW shows aren't there. New Jack matches are missing. Some PPVs are cut by an hour. I dunno I'm still on the fence. Also read that the crowds of ECW were censored out. Like wtf? The crowd was half the fun of an ECW show.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB