You are not logged in. Please register or login.

Ali
 Rep: 41 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

Ali wrote:
Intercourse wrote:

Meaning what exactly?

Ali

funny how you jumped on that so quickly...

I was curious what he meant.  If wanting to clear up an uncertainty or ambiguity is funny to you, then that's funny to me. 5



Ali

Intercourse
 Rep: 212 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

Intercourse wrote:

You know exactly what I mean Ali, I ain't going down one of your semantic spider threads!:peace:

Ali
 Rep: 41 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

Ali wrote:
Intercourse wrote:

You know exactly what I mean Ali, I ain't going down one of your semantic spider threads!:peace:

Actually, I don't.  I'm not a mind reader. Nor do I care.:peace:

Ali

RussTCB
 Rep: 633 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

RussTCB wrote:

removed

Ali
 Rep: 41 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

Ali wrote:
russtcb wrote:

This thread has finally been reduced to the equivalent of "No, you shut up"

14 19

No man.  That would be at MyGNR.  This is more of "I respectfully disagree with your opinion" or "we can agree to disagree".

Ali

monkeychow
 Rep: 661 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

monkeychow wrote:

Yeah my post was intended as kinda a light hearted joke, with a small element of comedically rubbing in my point, but re-reading it, it probably came off as plain bitchy or obscure.

Getting off the "Is it Izzy or Axl" thing for a moment. Yesterday I happened to re-watch the "behind the music show" on GNR or whatever that VH1 thing is they do.

During it I was thinking about what this situation must be like for Axl. Like from his perspective, he's worked pretty hard to fight on as GNR, there's been legal battles, finding new band members that will stick around, all of the various issues and dramas. Now even if some of this is his fault, he's still weathered it all and come out the other side....so from his POV the sudden increase in pressure to reunite just cos an external body like the RRHOF says it's time must be very annoying.

Like reuniting is surely up to him and the guys and is something they could do in their own way, but why just cos a third party wants to have a ceremony because it's been 30 years or whatever - I dunno it seems sort of an artificial way for a reunion to happen because it's on the hall's timeline not their own. While as a fan I obviously want to see it, I can see why if I was Axl I'd tell them to fuck the hell off.

otto
 Rep: 83 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

otto wrote:

1 minute into this video:
http://www.q1043.com/cc-common/mainhead … le=9957297

Slash: " "There should just be the five of us, but there are two other guys coming that were invited.  I don't know exactly how that works."

WOW! He's now dismissing Matt and Dizzy... I understand the banging on Dizzy, but on Matt that even plays with him on VR?

WOW!

I guess that's a clearly indication things are not that well on VR and that there's more things we aren't aware of.

monkeychow
 Rep: 661 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

monkeychow wrote:

Very interesting, I've thought for ages that there's serious conflict in VR, although I guess to be fair when they first asked him he misunderstood the question as how many other bands were being inducted, and was corrected to how many GNR members are being inducted,  so maybe he just wanted to clarify that originally guns only had 5 guys - but it does seem a little brutal to matt - espciallally when both matt and steven are cool with sharing duties these days.

otto
 Rep: 83 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

otto wrote:

And Adler, oh, Adler, just put things to rest. Freak as Axl is about everything people say about him, this quotes from Adler make it, IN MY POV, impossible to Axl to reunite with Adler on HOF.
http://loudwire.com/steven-adler-calls- … rock-hall/

First the rubbish Oh-Please-Adler-Dont-Embarass-Me:
"Put it this way; if the five original GN’R guys don’t get up there and play, I’m going up there just on the drum set and playing a couple of songs from ‘Appetite for Destruction.’"

Then chaos:
"“He’s my brother. I know he’s up to it,” Adler says about Slash and the Rock Hall reunion. “He wants to do it. I want to do it. Just from what I hear, Izzy [Stradlin]‘s not gonna show up and Axl will probably want to play with his hack band — his band of hacks. ‘Axl and His Hacks’ — it shouldn’t even be Guns N’ Roses. He’s just driving that name into the freakin’ ground. ‘Axl and His Hacks.’"

monkeychow
 Rep: 661 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

monkeychow wrote:

Yeah but a lot of what adler says is coming from his place of hurt.

The guy was introduced to heroin by Slash and Izzy and then thrown out of the band for it, and Slash is his childhood friend etc. His whole life since then has been about wanting to go back there and not being able to.

It's chicken and egg with him. He knows they're not going to reunite and that kills hiis dream and so he runs his mouth. But I'm pretty sure in a world where Axl and Slash had made up and given a public announcement that they'd play - Alder would only be giving quotes about how much fun it will be.

Adler was the first casualty of the band's excess. But his behaviour these days I see as a  symptom of the Axl/Slash war and not a cause of it.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB