You are not logged in. Please register or login.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: Reading, United Kingdom - August 27, 2010 (Reading Festival)

misterID wrote:

Acquiesce, completely disagree. People (haters, disgruntled fans, whatever) would be totally putting up with all kinds of bullshit if it were the old band, just like people did back in the day when he and Slash were doing things "their way." I think the line up has a lot more to do with it than anyone is willing to admit. You've already said you prefer the old line up, stopped really caring about this band. I'm not calling you a liar, but its very difficult for me to see someone who wants/wanted the reunion to not be willing to put up with THIS shit with "their" favorite band, or not care that they were back together. Because being a GNR fan from the very start -- YOU HAVE PUT UP WITH THE SAME SHIT. That's part of being a GNR fan, no matter who's in the group. Of course if you don't have that attachment to the current line up you're not going to want to put up with any shit. So its hard for me to buy that his behavior has "suddenly" caused people to be fed up.

I'll admit it. I would totally be more "positive" if Robin and Bucket were still in the band. And I would put up with all kinds of shit to see them live. That's me being honest.

Axlin16
 Rep: 768 

Re: Reading, United Kingdom - August 27, 2010 (Reading Festival)

Axlin16 wrote:
DCK wrote:
Axlin08 wrote:

And yes, a reunion would mean nothing. If anything Axl would pull more of his gay ass, pussy ass, punk ass, cocksucker bullshit, because he'd be pissed that he had to work with the real band again.

Normally you have good points, and I'm sure you do, but that tone is just gay.

Well them i'm a fag and proud of it.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: Reading, United Kingdom - August 27, 2010 (Reading Festival)

misterID wrote:
Axlin08 wrote:
DCK wrote:
Axlin08 wrote:

And yes, a reunion would mean nothing. If anything Axl would pull more of his gay ass, pussy ass, punk ass, cocksucker bullshit, because he'd be pissed that he had to work with the real band again.

Normally you have good points, and I'm sure you do, but that tone is just gay.

Well them i'm a fag and proud of it.

Well, you are speaking with a lisp now.

14

DCK
 Rep: 207 

Re: Reading, United Kingdom - August 27, 2010 (Reading Festival)

DCK wrote:
Axlin08 wrote:
DCK wrote:
Axlin08 wrote:

And yes, a reunion would mean nothing. If anything Axl would pull more of his gay ass, pussy ass, punk ass, cocksucker bullshit, because he'd be pissed that he had to work with the real band again.

Normally you have good points, and I'm sure you do, but that tone is just gay.

Well them i'm a fag and proud of it.

Well taken. 1+

buzzsaw
 Rep: 423 

Re: Reading, United Kingdom - August 27, 2010 (Reading Festival)

buzzsaw wrote:
misterID wrote:

Acquiesce, completely disagree. People (haters, disgruntled fans, whatever) would be totally putting up with all kinds of bullshit if it were the old band, just like people did back in the day when he and Slash were doing things "their way." I think the line up has a lot more to do with it than anyone is willing to admit. You've already said you prefer the old line up, stopped really caring about this band. I'm not calling you a liar, but its very difficult for me to see someone who wants/wanted the reunion to not be willing to put up with THIS shit with "their" favorite band, or not care that they were back together. Because being a GNR fan from the very start -- YOU HAVE PUT UP WITH THE SAME SHIT. That's part of being a GNR fan, no matter who's in the group. Of course if you don't have that attachment to the current line up you're not going to want to put up with any shit. So its hard for me to buy that his behavior has "suddenly" caused people to be fed up.

I'll admit it. I would totally be more "positive" if Robin and Bucket were still in the band. And I would put up with all kinds of shit to see them live. That's me being honest.

I saw them in Chicago in 92.  I was pissed when they took forever to come on.  I was worried there wasn't going to be a show.  I didn't like any of this then, and I was sitting there waiting for them.  Now I admit I'd be more likely to wait for the reunion show and more likely to leave for this act, but I wouldn't be happy in either situation.

Re: Reading, United Kingdom - August 27, 2010 (Reading Festival)

johndivney wrote:
Bono wrote:

The only person to blame is Axl fucking Rose for thinking he was above the law.

he is above the law. & so am i. the only people to blame are the fucking law makers & pharisees.
people who desire & demand control & suppression of the individual. people who think everyone else should be living their lives accord to archaic & idiotic rules that these imaginationless drones value because they're too afraid to re-evaluate.. & i understand how that fear can be overwhelming & that's why it's such a volitile reaction..

mickronson
 Rep: 118 

Re: Reading, United Kingdom - August 27, 2010 (Reading Festival)

mickronson wrote:

wow, try getting a job with that attitude.

DCK
 Rep: 207 

Re: Reading, United Kingdom - August 27, 2010 (Reading Festival)

DCK wrote:

Well, 10 minutes late and counting. Great. Be within 30, fashionable late, and it's forgiven. Everything else is not acceptable.

Olorin
 Rep: 268 

Re: Reading, United Kingdom - August 27, 2010 (Reading Festival)

Olorin wrote:

14

Its as true as Axl DJ and Co. didnt accept their million dollar cheque as it goes against their rocknroll values...

Olorin
 Rep: 268 

Re: Reading, United Kingdom - August 27, 2010 (Reading Festival)

Olorin wrote:

Is the curfew at 11pm tonight? They are supposed to come on at 9 right?

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB