You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Season
It has nothing to do with being biased. The experts all said the Blackhawks were terrible in game one. Melrose said they stole the game. Game one was a sloppy, poorly played hockey game.
Game 2 was a different style of game game, but the Blackhaks played equally poor (especially in the 3rd) and still pulled out the win. That is what should be worrying you...not that it's 0-2, but the way it's 0-2.
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Season
^ I think 3 is the most important game in a series.. Not saying the team that wins 3 wins or anything like that, just imho it's the most important, even prior to a series beginning. Regardless, it's 2-1 right now, so Flyers pretty much need to win Friday. We'll see, but they definitely deserve to be here, and are playing pound for pound against the Hawks.
- Communist China
- Rep: 130
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Season
Right back in it! Now that we're going into Game 4 can we stop using the "Blackhawks played badly that game" excuse?! After 3 games the series is what the series says it is. 2-1, all 1 goal victories, all home team wins. No excuses.
No. The Blackhawks played horribly again, yet arguably should have won that game too. No excuses, just the facts.
