You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
- monkeychow
- Rep: 661
Re: PAUL STANLEY: DOC MCGHEE Is Not Managing GUNS N' ROSES
What they did to the timeline was concerning to say the least 
But it does have spock.....
On GNR....I want to hear a studio version of Axl's cover of sailing...that would be so so so so cool.
Re: PAUL STANLEY: DOC MCGHEE Is Not Managing GUNS N' ROSES
wow, this thread turned all weird for a while, anyway, I wonder if there will be a twitter post from Axl bitching out Paul Stanley next. 
Re: PAUL STANLEY: DOC MCGHEE Is Not Managing GUNS N' ROSES
What they did to the timeline was concerning to say the least
On GNR....I want to hear a studio version of Axl's cover of sailing...that would be so so so so cool.
I am not a big fan of any Gnr studio cover songs. LALD, KOHD, Down on the Farm, Attitude, etc have all been so much better live...rough and raw I say.:mosh:
- monkeychow
- Rep: 661
Re: PAUL STANLEY: DOC MCGHEE Is Not Managing GUNS N' ROSES
^ I agree about LALD and KOHD, even the live version of LALD on the single was insanely good, but I think the TSI songs rocked in studio form. I dunno that sailing boot is so awesome, the way axl's playing around with the melody...i just want to hear that in decent quality without the talking audience etc
Re: PAUL STANLEY: DOC MCGHEE Is Not Managing GUNS N' ROSES
war wrote:poor buzz
Not poor me. I'm really getting to the point that I don't even care anymore. Sad.
"So I got bored and left them there, they were just dead weight to me. Better down the road without that load." Neil Young-Thrasher 
Re: PAUL STANLEY: DOC MCGHEE Is Not Managing GUNS N' ROSES
Acquiesce wrote:Psychics are frauds that claim to have powers they know very well they don't have. Religious figures are generally well intentioned people that have a genuine belief because it's what's been accepted and passed down by society for many centuries.
I don't think that's true of all Psychics. Indeed there are many scanners and con people out there, but I also think there is a part of the psychic community that genuinely believe they have extra-sensory abilities and share what they beleive to be true with people.
They may or may not be misguided in their beliefs, it might just be chance or whatever, but I don't think it's accurate to say every psychic is intentionally lying and aware they don't have powers. I think some of them beleive they do.
Gagarin wrote:Hey, may I suggest we debate whether or not JJ Abrams new Star Trek movie is canon Star Trek? I mean, this thread needs more internet controversey.
Give us a short run downs of the arguments for and against? Based on being an extremely casual fan of the Star Trek saga, and thoroughly enjoying the film, I'm going with yes.
It ignores 29th Century history from Voager and Enterprise, hence if it was proper cannon... JJ Abrams "Star Trek" would have ended with a time ship from the future appearing to protect the time line and kick Nero's ass.
