You are not logged in. Please register or login.

RussTCB
 Rep: 633 

Re: 'Alice' takes in $116.3 million in the US

RussTCB wrote:

removed

RussTCB
 Rep: 633 

Re: 'Alice' takes in $116.3 million in the US

RussTCB wrote:

removed

supaplex
 Rep: 57 

Re: 'Alice' takes in $116.3 million in the US

supaplex wrote:

saw it too a couple days ago, in 3d. my only complaint... why was it made in 3d? other than that, great movie

Neemo
 Rep: 485 

Re: 'Alice' takes in $116.3 million in the US

Neemo wrote:

My wife wants me to take her to see this

i've heard that helina bonham carter (queen of hearts) steals the show

RussTCB
 Rep: 633 

Re: 'Alice' takes in $116.3 million in the US

RussTCB wrote:

removed

Stacey
 Rep: 31 

Re: 'Alice' takes in $116.3 million in the US

Stacey wrote:

Saw this Saturday night in IMAX 3D

I *LOVED* this movie. I'm incredibly impressed with how it was handled. Although I never read "Alice Through the Looking Glass", I'm told that a lot of the backstory was brought about from that book rather than "Wonderland"

I think I want to see it again, in regular definition instead of 3D. I really liked the effects that were present, but there really wasn't enough of it to warrant me staring up at the gigantic screen through the uncomfortable glasses for two hours. smile

All in all, great film.

supaplex
 Rep: 57 

Re: 'Alice' takes in $116.3 million in the US

supaplex wrote:
russtcb wrote:
supaplex wrote:

saw it too a couple days ago, in 3d. my only complaint... why was it made in 3d? other than that, great movie

It wasn't filmed in 3D, they only made it 3D after the fact because 3D is the craze right now.

i didn't know that, thanks for the info. that definitely clarifies things up a bit. 5

RussTCB
 Rep: 633 

Re: 'Alice' takes in $116.3 million in the US

RussTCB wrote:

removed

Axlin16
 Rep: 768 

Re: 'Alice' takes in $116.3 million in the US

Axlin16 wrote:

I'm just glad to see Tim Burton getting some respect (again) for a change. Always loved that guy, and Batman '89 & Returns, especially Returns, are some of my favorite films ever made.

Bono
 Rep: 386 

Re: 'Alice' takes in $116.3 million in the US

Bono wrote:

I didn't really liked it. I was excited for it but...... I wasn't overly impressed by it. Visiually it was ok but I didn't like Johnny Depp as the Mad Hatter at all and I hated the story which is basically a sequel to the original. Lame. It had none of the wonder of the original  story. Alice went through Wonderland as if nothing suprised her. I'd give it a 5/10 It's definately not a positive "reboot" of a timeless classic.  the sad part now though is an entire new generation of kids will think this is the story of Alice in Wonderland when it's so not.

Like you said Stacey  in the "most recent movie" thread they should've made two movies. remake the original one first and then do this one as a follow up but with some tweaks and new things. All they did was use the same old stuff from the original and through it into a weaker story.  I mena this was marketed as and titled "ALICE IN WONDERLAND" yet she seems so unimpressed by any of it. Almost as if she's Alice in Standardland.

This movie might've been good had it nothing to live up to but it did so in my opinion it failed and it's gonna conitune to fail for an entire new generation of kids who's parents will show them this movie first ripping them of from experiencing  the true Alice in WONDERLAND.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB