You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: GnREvolution Arcade Madness - Discussion and Results Thread
Way too many Zeldas and Marios. The first Resident Evil(or the 4th) deserved a spot before that many in one franchise.
There's two MARIOS! AND both are completely different games. One is a left to right platformer the other a 3D Collect Em All adventure.
The Zelda's well with the exception of Twilight those games are fantastic and deserve their spot. Will agree on the Resi 4 point that one is a modern gem.
- IRISH OS1R1S
- Rep: 59
Re: GnREvolution Arcade Madness - Discussion and Results Thread
James Lofton wrote:Way too many Zeldas and Marios. The first Resident Evil(or the 4th) deserved a spot before that many in one franchise.
There's two MARIOS! AND both are completely different games. One is a left to right platformer the other a 3D Collect Em All adventure.
The Zelda's well with the exception of Twilight those games are fantastic and deserve their spot. Will agree on the Resi 4 point that one is a modern gem.
Word.
Re: GnREvolution Arcade Madness - Discussion and Results Thread
Max Payne should not have lost to Mortal Kombat.
True. MK was a whole experience in itself, first game to use digitized images that effectively and convincingly. Milestone game that. Max Payne was just a really well executed film noir game. Unique in it's own way, but too niche to be influential.
Re: GnREvolution Arcade Madness - Discussion and Results Thread
i like gamespot 
anyway MKII was one of the first to use the finishing moves thing and to bring in gore into the games...i played MKII nonstop loved it...didnt care for max payne...but i'm not voting so my opinion doesnt count
though i thought that MKIII sucked the combos were already hard enough to do in ii then in III they changed them all and made them even more complicated
Re: GnREvolution Arcade Madness - Discussion and Results Thread
Use Metacritic or Gamerankings scores for ties. That is the fairest way to do it.
EDIT: Metacritic takes scores from many sources and then takes an average. Is good but it can be a bit difficult to find old games on it. Gamerankings is better as it also has scores for a lot of old games. Better to go with one of them than just take a review score from one site.
EDIT 2: If you use Gamerankings Max Payne would go through over Kombat. So even though I think Kombat is better, I think Payne should go through over it.
