You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: Michael Jackson's This Is It Discussion
Thats the family of the second case.
They had dealings with George Lopez and Chris Tucker before MJ got involved. Point being, both those guys cut the Arvizos off when they found them to be assholes as they were. MJ never saw or understood it. They could push it further and further and further with MJ where they got nowhere with Lopez and Tucker. Actually, with the Lopez issue, I think they pushed it way further than what is *normal* in my culture, help and money wise. It was pretty fucking sick the entire thing. And then they pressed JC Penny for thousands, saying the mom was beaten up by guards. In reality she was prolly smacked silly by her husband and then put it into being assaulted. They were sick trash of people. It doesn't take much digging into this case to start see massive holes.
When they first started the molestation case, they didn't even go to the police first..nooo...they fucking went straight to Tom Sheddon (the lawyer from the first case). All sick shit.
MJ had tons of mags in his house with porn. Playboy and Hustler. He liked the naked girls. Usually in a box under his bed, locked, or somewhere in his closet, locked. Arvizo kids were caught by people working at Neverland going thru the porn stacks, breaking into the cellar drinking whine and getting drunk. Most of the time MJ wasn't even there.
Re: Michael Jackson's This Is It Discussion
I certaintly think MJ was neglegent with the porn. You can't have that amount of kids around, there or not there, and have that kind of stuff around. You're asking for trouble.
He either should've cut back on the kids being around, or should've tossed the porn.
I think it was pretty obvious that Sheddon was another opportunist that wanted to make himself a legend for being the man that took down Michael Jackson, nothing more.
Attention seekers go after attention getters. Opportunist 101.
- tejastech08
- Rep: 194
Re: Michael Jackson's This Is It Discussion
A Theatrical Release is the wrong move imo.
I think a better move would be striking a lucrative TV deal, then using the airing, to offer a DVD and/or audio CD, exclusive only during the broadcast.
Blu-ray with high def video and lossless audio.
