You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1 Re: Management » Site certificate warning? » 7 weeks ago

polluxlm wrote:

I don't know man, my browser still labels it unsecure. There has been no announcement.

Now I'm a tad worried.  On my desktop, it shows me the certificate was updated on August 31, 2024.  Yet when I visit on my iphone, I get the expired certificate warning.  If this site didn't install it, someone else has, and the security and passwords of everyone have been compromised.

#2 Re: Management » Site certificate warning? » 7 weeks ago

Glad to see this has returned.  I know a few people quit posting due to the security risk.  No one made an announcement, and I just recently noticed.  So kudos to this being fixed.  Assuming we know that the new certificate is owned by James or whomever owns evo.

#3 Re: The Garden » Current Events... » 12 weeks ago

She’s still losing in the BG states. And only 1 poll has shown her up in any of them. The odds still say Trump and if the election were held today he’d have 290+EVs. That’s what all the polls say at realclearpolitics.com

She got the surge in money because Biden’s dryed up and donors were withholding. Quick google search will confirm all that.

#4 Re: The Garden » Current Events... » 12 weeks ago

mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
mitchejw wrote:

Kamala has all the momentum in the world right now...but why?! Not sure I understand.

I thought Trump was unstoppable.

Also, anyone notice how substance less 2024 campaigning has been? Not a word about policy. This is stupid.


Really?  Walz is like the worst pick she could have made?  MN was all but guarunteed, and he's ultra liberal.  How is that going to help in AZ and PA, states most polls still show Trump leading in.  This doesn't give her AZ or GA.  I don't think it helps in either WI or MI.  She needs to win all of these states to win the election, and after the initial shock of her nomination wears off, the polls are gonna continue to show what they have - she's losing in the battleground states.  Maybe that will change, but the guy who stood by and watched as Minneapolis burned in 2020 isn't going to go over well with middle America.  Kelly or Shapiro would have given her the edge she needs, Walz does none of that.

I'm just commenting on the alleged polls which could be meaningless..they all say she's winning everywhere.

Your comment about 'middle America' puzzles me a bit. Tim Walz is a governor in  middle America.

I think and actually hope you're right. I don't want this stupid shit anymore. I dislike Trump vehemently...but Kamala?! Are you a woman? check. Are you a minority? Check. That's all the qualification you need. I'd be called a racist or sexist for saying this outloud.

I have dreaded November for at least a year. And I'm a total hypocrite for saying so...but I think I've voting for Trump.

Sure, in a dictionary Minnesota is part of the Midwest, but compare them to the rest of fly over country and along with WI, and MI, they're the outliers.  Illinois would be red if not for Chicago.  Prior to Trump in 16, we had to go back to Regan for any of these states to have voted for the GOP. 

I've been dead wrong the past two elections, so even I don't put any weight in my own observation.  But all the polls are saying the economy, immigration and crime are at the forefront of the electorate.  The July jobs reports was horrific, we're at record inflation, and economists are throwing the R word around.  The border is a fucking disaster and Harris was the Border Czar.  Crime is the one area they have going for them as it has dropped 10% from where it's been the past few years.  But again, Harris is the worst one to put out on that issue.  Cause she is the one who bailed out rioters in Minnesota during the Floyd riots.  She was the first one to "reimagine policing" when BLM and the far left were demanding to defund the police.  And unfortunately, there is a lot of tape of Harris presenting herself as "woke".  That was the one area Biden had some credit, because he's the guy behind the 93 crime bill and didn't support the defund movement in 2020. 

Trump went on TV and said Harris wasn't a black woman.  If any other person in any other universe said that, it'd be over.  But nope, fucking kryptonite.  Because as you already said and know from your lived experience in Chicago, people, but black people especially, know Harris has nothing in common with their heritage and story.  People can smell bullshit and Harris is as fake, manufactured and insincere as they come.  To say nothing of how interesting it is that the Democrats who profess to be the guardians of democracy and freedom against Trump (their words, not mine), just installed a candidate with zero discussion or debate with the public.  It just happened without zero input from the electorate.  And I have to believe that this fundamentally undemocratic and unamerican process is going to rub more than not the wrong way when they finally acknowledge that.  And in that vein, I just don't see how two months from now people in PA, NV, GA and AZ are all of a sudden going to see Harris as the better candidate.  Especially with WW3 being moments away from starting in both Israel and Ukraine.  There's records to compare now, and one is objectively better than the other. 

But, like I said earlier, I have been wrong the past two cycles and haven't voted for the winning candidate in 20 years.  So the opposite of what I think is probably what's going to happen.

#5 Re: The Garden » Current Events... » 12 weeks ago

mitchejw wrote:

Kamala has all the momentum in the world right now...but why?! Not sure I understand.

I thought Trump was unstoppable.

Also, anyone notice how substance less 2024 campaigning has been? Not a word about policy. This is stupid.


Really?  Walz is like the worst pick she could have made?  MN was all but guarunteed, and he's ultra liberal.  How is that going to help in AZ and PA, states most polls still show Trump leading in.  This doesn't give her AZ or GA.  I don't think it helps in either WI or MI.  She needs to win all of these states to win the election, and after the initial shock of her nomination wears off, the polls are gonna continue to show what they have - she's losing in the battleground states.  Maybe that will change, but the guy who stood by and watched as Minneapolis burned in 2020 isn't going to go over well with middle America.  Kelly or Shapiro would have given her the edge she needs, Walz does none of that.

#6 Re: The Sunset Strip » House of The Dragon » 14 weeks ago

Digging this season so far, though I don't have a clue what their endgame is with Daemon and the Weirwood tree influence.  My favorite YouTube Preston Jacobs was lampooned for over a decade for claiming the weirwood throne at the vale was the cause of Robin Arryn's seizures, and the show took that idea and ran with it. 

Really really like what they're doing with Aemond. 

Hidden Text:

In the book he came across to me as the ultimate swordman and military man.  He was portrayed as calm and collected, a better version of the Rogue Prince Daemon.  Not here.  He's power hungry like most Targaryen's, and is as ruthless as Daemon ever was, but he has fucking Vhagar.

My only issue is that they made Aegon seem overly dumb.  In season 1, the Valyrian dragon tamers scolded the other children for not being as devoted and connected to their dragon bond as Aegon.  He was the example of someone who naturally and enthusiastically put in the work to bond and train their dragon.  Then they have riding his nuke just like Dr. Strangelove as he bumbles into battle. 

The director said the kiss between Mysaria and Rhaenyra wasn't planned, Emma Darcy just adlibbed it.  Kind of weird.  Both Dany and Cersei have several lesbian encounters in the book, but the show for all its tits and ass glory never used it.  Weird to force it in here and detract from the fact Rhaenyra is supposed to be losing her shit and showing all the mad Targaryen traits, but just like in season 1 they seem to want to force a girl boss on us for team black. 

#7 Re: The Garden » Current Events... » 14 weeks ago

6ddAp.png

Because I'm bored and these maps can be fun.  This is my hypothetical outcome if Harris goes with Josh Shapiro as her VP.  Going with Shapiro would presumably move PA into the (D) column again, and would help pull Wisconsin and Michigan over as well.  I don't think such a move is enough to have any impact on GA or NC, regardless of who is picked.  NV and AZ seem especially Trump favorable with the immigration issue, so again, none help move those two from where they're at today.  Maine has also been going towards Trump, but a moderate Democrat might help.  I'm giving it to Harris, but think 1 of the extra EVs will firmly go to Trump.  Every other state votes as it did in 2020.  This puts us at no winner in the EV, so the House votes.

#8 Re: The Garden » Current Events... » 14 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

If I vote, it’ll be for Vance 16


Vote dude. I know the south will be red regardless, but it’s an important right everyone should exercise. I don’t care who you vote for, but vote.

#9 Re: The Garden » Current Events... » 14 weeks ago

It's Harris.  The Democrats don't have a choice, the party, particularly the left wing orthodoxy, have already said as much.  Immediately after the debate, prominent Democrats said they'd revolt if "the first black woman" was denied the position.  She polled horribly in 2020 and withdrew before the first primary was even held.  Most polls I've seen show her doing worse than Biden in the swing states.  And I don't think that is gonna change, she is less liked than Trump if such a thing is possible. 

Never say never, but the right wing wackjobs saying this was all planned are off their meds.  This isn't how you successfully run a campaign against Trump.  A significant portion of the party are going to be outraged their isn't any debate in nominating Harris, and when she takes down 1-2 Senate races, flipping the Senate GOP, the Democrats are going to blame it all on her.  I don't see any viable way Harris wins this, and the Democrats have only themselves to blame for lying and dismissing any concerns over Biden's now objective cognitive decline.  They could have had an enthusiastic primary where they picked the next generation of Democrat.  They're going to try to brand Harris as just that, but I'm calling it now that Trump gets more of the black vote than any Republican in a century. 

And worse, I have no doubt Biden is going to return to his cave and only be seen through teleprompter sightings.  He's not able to run for reelection because the majority of his own party thinks he's lost it, yet is still able to push us closer to WW3 with his disastrous foreign policy.  That this dipshit thinks he's remotely successful at diplomacy is the biggest sign his brain is decaying there is.

#10 Re: The Garden » Current Events... » 15 weeks ago

mitchejw wrote:

Adam Schiff is seriously asking for Biden to drop out? It's unbelievable how quickly the Dems are unraveling. The coalition is unraveling daily now. Their only solution? Replace Biden at the 11th hour.

It's a joke.

I'm disgusted that they're offering Americans nothing. The best Dems have to offer is 'wait, let's replace Biden at the last second.'

Not only is it  terrible strategy to go after your own incumbent...they aren't offering anything at all to anyone. What would 4 more years look like? No clue...no plan...nothing to offer...

Guess we need to introduce more articles of impeachment.

Welcome to the club, Mitch. Ain't it a lot easier and happier when you call out both sides?

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB