You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
- Smoking Guns
- Rep: 330
Re: Guns N' Roses update official site
http://web.gunsnroses.com/news/article. … &fext=.jsp
Updated again. Ummmm... apparently Slash, Izzy and the rest ruined Use Your Illusions.
Who is the genius behind the controls of this site?
Now this fucking pisses me fucking off and makes my fucking blood boil. FUCK HIM AND FUCK THE MOTHER FUCKER THAT RUNS THAT GODDAMN SITE. I want to return my two copies of CD knowing now that a GNR official finds this the time to rub Izzy and Slash's face in the mud. This is beyond ungrateful, classless, and low down. Its just plain wrong. Izzy? Seriously? One of the nicest guys ever that wrote some of GNR's biggest hits ever. Oh, so another guitar player coud have come up with Sweet Child O'Mine. Who wrote this fucking review? Must be a member at HTGTH.
Re: Guns N' Roses update official site
Of all the recent articles talking about the new album positively, thats the one they chose?
The fucking Boston Herald? Who gives a fuck what they think, surely a more prestigious newspaper reviewed the album.
Oh wait, but none of them said that 
Absolutely pathetic.
- Smoking Guns
- Rep: 330
Re: Guns N' Roses update official site
Shit like that turns off fans. I am so angry. I haven't heard one bad peep from the former guys. Not one. CLASSLESS!
- Smoking Guns
- Rep: 330
Re: Guns N' Roses update official site
Ha, they deleted my topic about it on HTGTH!
- tejastech08
- Rep: 194
Re: Guns N' Roses update official site
Shit like that turns off fans. I am so angry. I haven't heard one bad peep from the former guys. Not one. CLASSLESS!
Agreed 100%.
Re: Guns N' Roses update official site
I agree it's probably a little over the top to drag the old members into it, BUT everyone and anyone who has a negative thing to say about Chinese Democracy ultimately points out the absence of original members. So what's the difference?
- tejastech08
- Rep: 194
Re: Guns N' Roses update official site
I agree it's probably a little over the top to drag the old members into it, BUT everyone and anyone who has a negative thing to say about Chinese Democracy ultimately points out the absence of original members. So what's the difference?
The difference is those reviews aren't being touted on Velvet Revolver's website, etc.
Re: Guns N' Roses update official site
Whatever, I'm not gonna let this bring down my excitement. There are thousands of people slamming the new CD because Slash isn't there anymore, they post ONE article saying the CD is great even without those guys and suddenly THEY'RE the bad guys.
