You are not logged in. Please register or login.

Big Gun
 Rep: 11 

Re: METALLICA Discussion

Big Gun wrote:
estrangedpaul wrote:

Yep if someone could PM me too that would be great!!

yes me too, still praying for some miracle to come my way.:D

Axl S
 Rep: 112 

Re: METALLICA Discussion

Axl S wrote:

And because I was away all day I missed this shit. sad

I better go and see my Personal Massage therapist then.

EDIT: Have received my massage. I am calm.

Will update with thoughts on my message later.

Hetter27
 Rep: 0 

Re: METALLICA Discussion

Hetter27 wrote:

THANK YOU SANTA !!!

Axl4Life
 Rep: 28 

Re: METALLICA Discussion

Axl4Life wrote:

This album is absolutely amazing. One of Metallica's best ever. I absoutely love every song on the album, it's got something to fit everyones taste. The Judas Kiss and The Unforgiven III are my personal favourites. I'll wait until the albums released until I comment about it properly.

Big Gun
 Rep: 11 

Re: METALLICA Discussion

Big Gun wrote:

my inbox still empty...:(

mickronson
 Rep: 118 

Re: METALLICA Discussion

mickronson wrote:

after a few more listens of certain tracks its growin on me...
the rest im not so sure.. but i never expected to like every single song..  rarely happens

BLS-Pride
 Rep: 212 

Re: METALLICA Discussion

BLS-Pride wrote:

If you dislike this album I have no idea what you are looking for from this band. The Unforgiven III kicks fucking ass man. You need to sit and listen to this sucker on high volume and really listen too it.

Axl S
 Rep: 112 

Re: METALLICA Discussion

Axl S wrote:
Hidden Text:

All Nightmare Long. Why isn't this the first single. It kicks major ass. Unforgiven III is imo above average. Nothing on the first one but better than part 2.

Overall this is a solid album My Apocalypse is the weakest track and it's a shame it has to close the album.

BLS-Pride
 Rep: 212 

Re: METALLICA Discussion

BLS-Pride wrote:
Hidden Text:

Yeah way better than II. Yeah very poor choice on the first single. I think it's the second weakest song on the album.

Rex
 Rep: 50 

Re: METALLICA Discussion

Rex wrote:

Everyone who hasn't downloaded this, it's okay.  Lars said so.

Metallica is cool with online leak

Mathew Ingram, today at 11:56 AM EDT




My, how times have changed. It wasn't all that long ago that the heavy-metal band Metallica was known for its strident opposition to online music services such as Napster, since the group claimed that they were nothing more than a front for piracy. Now, the band is not only streaming its own unreleased songs through its website -- Mission Metallica -- and offering fans the ability to download high-quality tracks before the CD is actually released, but the boys don't even seem to mind that the entire album has leaked online already, apparently as a result of a French record store selling copies before the September 12 official release.

In an interview with a radio station in San Francisco on Tuesday, drummer Lars Ulrich -- who was the front-man for the group during its fight with Napster -- seemed to be taking the whole event in stride. "Listen, we're 10 days from release," he said. "I mean, from here, we're golden. If this thing leaks all over the world today or tomorrow, happy days. Happy days. Trust me -- 10 days out and it hasn't quote unquote fallen off the truck yet? Everybody's happy. It's 2008 and it's part of how it is these days, so it's fine. We're happy."

Lars is right about one thing: leaks have become part of the record business in the digital age, whether bands and record labels like it or not. Artists such as Britney Spears and Gnarls Barkley have reportedly moved up the dates of their album releases due to early leaks, and some artists (such as rapper The Game) have even leaked their own albums online, under the assumption that someone else is going to do it anyway. At least that way they get to control the quality of the music: In the case of the recently leaked tracks from Chinese Democracy -- the long-awaited album from Guns and Roses -- both the band and its label were reportedly upset because the songs weren't finished yet.

A glimpse of the old Metallica seemed to rear its head earlier this year, when the band held "listening parties" for some music bloggers to introduce them to the new album, and then apparently got upset when those blogs wrote about their impressions of the disc. But after the incident got some attention in the blogosphere, the band released a statement saying that it was unaware of the legal letters that had gone out to the bloggers (which it said came from someone at its management company) and that it didn't mind having the reviews online at all. Now, it's even embracing unofficial leaks of entire albums. What's the world coming to?

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ … /WBmingram

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB