You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed
Also, don't some of these games have hidden tracks? I don't have any idea, but I thought I heard that somewhere. What are the odds of it being on the game if it's not announced?
I couldn't see them not announcing this one if it's on there just because of the buzz it would generate, but you can't really apply normal logic to this situation after this long.
Re: Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed
I work at a newspaper, so I have access to the wires that newspapers send their stories to. This will show up in your local paper, or not, tomorrow. The New York Times might put it on their site tonight sometime.
In other words, every newspaper in the country and beyond has access to this info now.
- BurningHills
- Rep: 15
Re: Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed
BurningHills wrote:Chinese Democracy Starts...Now?
Not likely, but there's always a chance.
\
Well, something's obviously starting now, or soon. Even if it is just a single, you gotta take baby steps with GNR. Everything remotely signaling forward movement on Axl's part must be considered a big deal. That is, unless this all blows up.
Re: Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed
buzzsaw wrote:BurningHills wrote:Chinese Democracy Starts...Now?
Not likely, but there's always a chance.
\
Well, something's obviously starting now, or soon. Even if it is just a single, you gotta take baby steps with GNR. Everything remotely signaling forward movement on Axl's part must be considered a big deal. That is, unless this all blows up.
Oh, I agree...but history says things like this have blown up before. I don't think I'll actually believe it's out until I see it on a shelf myself. I still don't think I'll ever see it on a shelf. This reeks of the harley mess all over again...they can't release an album anytime soon. Who knows who is in the band and who isn't at this point. They have to be able to tour to support it and they can't tour without a band. Right now they have BBF as the only guitarist that doesn't have plans (that I know of) for the rest of the year and he doesn't play a major role on the album (last we heard). I don't see how this can work even if they want it to.
Re: Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed
Right now they have BBF as the only guitarist that doesn't have plans (that I know of) for the rest of the year and he doesn't play a major role on the album (last we heard). I don't see how this can work even if they want it to.
This thing is launching with a Bucket tune. That pretty much tells the story regarding that issue. You dont have guitarists in the post BH era record hundreds of solos and then go back to the old well for no reason.
I'm starting to think the recent leaks were a test to see reaction to what is OBVIOUSLY a Bucket influenced record, and well you know what the reactions were. Cries everywhere to bring him back.
The haters could no longer hate(nesquick the exception) because hating him meant you were hating the songs.
and on the seventh day, the bots were vindicated......
Re: Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed
I'm starting to think the recent leaks were a test to see reaction to what is OBVIOUSLY a Bucket influenced record, and well you know what the reactions were. Cries everywhere to bring him back.
oh i thought the cries were that there were too many fucking ballads 
, at least I know thats what i was crying about 
