You are not logged in. Please register or login.

James
 Rep: 664 

Re: Time Magazine considers the leaks Chinese Democracy

James wrote:
BrokenGlassNCigs wrote:

I agree. Azoff and Gould have to address this and obviously just plainly put "it's not the finished product. That will be coming later this year." Something like that.

Merck 2.0?:haha:

Not going to cut the mustard...

James
 Rep: 664 

Re: Time Magazine considers the leaks Chinese Democracy

James wrote:

I read Time Magazine. No way in hell do they review this record twice this year. Not going to waste precious space in their magazine for double reviews.


GNR have to do something quick or CD sinks like the Titanic and never gets released.

Gunslinger
 Rep: 88 

Re: Time Magazine considers the leaks Chinese Democracy

Gunslinger wrote:

This is a good thing, you have now basically had your album reviewed by TIME FUCKING MAGAZINE...time to put up or shut up.  This is the last chance...

Dreamline
 Rep: 64 

Re: Time Magazine considers the leaks Chinese Democracy

Dreamline wrote:

Was this in the actual magazine or just on the Time website?  I couldn't find it on the site.  Either their search engine sucks ass or (gasp) it's been removed?

war
 Rep: 108 

Re: Time Magazine considers the leaks Chinese Democracy

war wrote:
Dreamline wrote:

Was this in the actual magazine or just on the Time website?  I couldn't find it on the site.  Either their search engine sucks ass or (gasp) it's been removed?

it's still on the website

http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0 … d=rss-arts

James
 Rep: 664 

Re: Time Magazine considers the leaks Chinese Democracy

James wrote:
Dreamline wrote:

Was this in the actual magazine or just on the Time website?  I couldn't find it on the site.  Either their search engine sucks ass or (gasp) it's been removed?

Its on the website. I should have posted the full link.

It'll be in the magazine as well since Stein wrote the review.


http://www.time.com/time/magazine/artic … 82,00.html

tejastech08
 Rep: 194 

Re: Time Magazine considers the leaks Chinese Democracy

tejastech08 wrote:

Axl's fucked. Gonna have to release different songs on the album if he ever releases an album. No one is going to be willing to pay for this outside a very small number of hardcore fans. Everyone already has high quality versions of around 70% of the album. That is the point of no return.

Dreamline
 Rep: 64 

Re: Time Magazine considers the leaks Chinese Democracy

Dreamline wrote:
James Lofton wrote:
Dreamline wrote:

Was this in the actual magazine or just on the Time website?  I couldn't find it on the site.  Either their search engine sucks ass or (gasp) it's been removed?

Its on the website. I should have posted the full link.

It'll be in the magazine as well since Stein wrote the review.


http://www.time.com/time/magazine/artic … 82,00.html

Thanks James!  I guess their search just sucks then.

Though I did come across an article titled "Japan's Booming Sex Niche: Elder Porn", so my time was not completely wasted. yikes

James
 Rep: 664 

Re: Time Magazine considers the leaks Chinese Democracy

James wrote:
tejastech08 wrote:

Axl's fucked. Gonna have to release different songs on the album if he ever releases an album. No one is going to be willing to pay for this outside a very small number of hardcore fans. Everyone already has high quality versions of around 70% of the album. That is the point of no return.

Yeah, he is now officially up shit creek without a paddle. Reviews are pouring in everywhere, and its gonna get even worse in the coming weeks when every single magazine(Blender, People, Entertainment Weekly, US, Spin,etc.) are reviewing this.


Axl may have to scrap album one and just release album two.


This saga just took a bizarre turn....

Communist China
 Rep: 130 

Re: Time Magazine considers the leaks Chinese Democracy

If nothing else, the name of the record should be changed.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB