Board footer

RussTCB

 Rep: 633 

Re: The BATMAN Thread

RussTCB wrote:

removed

tejastech08

 Rep: 194 

Re: The BATMAN Thread

tejastech08 wrote:

They hadn't shown what the 'other' side of his face looked like thought, they kept that under wraps.

Ah. I'm dumb. Sorry/

Yeah they have been keeping it under wraps, partially to blow away the fanboys and partially b/c it's bad for publicity when you're trying to market the movie to kids and their parents. WB jumped all over it yesterday and asked the site that first posted it to take it down.

tejastech08

 Rep: 194 

Re: The BATMAN Thread

tejastech08 wrote:

By the way, they have re-vamped the official website and it kicks ass:

http://thedarkknight.warnerbros.com/

Very cool intro and then you have the option to watch all 3 trailers, and you even have the option to download them in Quicktime or Windows Media from iPod quality all the way up to high def. I love how easy it is to use. A lot of movie sites are difficult to download trailers from.

sic.

 Rep: 150 

Re: The BATMAN Thread

sic. wrote:

Why so serious?

'66 style

'89 style

Indy style

RussTCB

 Rep: 633 

Re: The BATMAN Thread

RussTCB wrote:

removed

A Private Eye

 Rep: 77 

Re: The BATMAN Thread

A Private Eye wrote:

That's fine by me

RussTCB

 Rep: 633 

Re: The BATMAN Thread

RussTCB wrote:

removed

RussTCB

 Rep: 633 

Re: The BATMAN Thread

RussTCB wrote:

removed

James

 Rep: 664 

Re: The BATMAN Thread

James wrote:

That is definitely a long running time. Films that are longer than two hours usually pay a steep price for that at the box office. There are obvious exceptions to the rule, but I'm surprised they didn't trim a bit of fat from the film.

PaSnow

 Rep: 205 

Re: The BATMAN Thread

PaSnow wrote:

'But my instincts are that that is ridiculous.'

Thank God someone put that tale to bed. I was getting sick of hearing that.