You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: US Politics Thread
Doesn’t Trumps moving forward with DACA removal prove more executive overreach?
Even when the Supreme Court rules..he does whatever the hell he wants....AGAIN
Trump is doing exactly what he wanted despite a Supreme Court ruling...
Re: US Politics Thread
I’ve been studying the Rasmussen poll closely because it seems to be the only one that consistently favors conservatives. I’ve noticed that they release results almost everyday and the results of those polls are extremely erratic. Trumps approvals go from a +5 approval to a -12 to a -5 back to even all within two weeks. I think that is the best evidence for a flawed methodology that I’ve ever seen.
Re: US Politics Thread
mitchejw wrote:Doesn’t Trumps moving forward with DACA removal prove more executive overreach?
Even when the Supreme Court rules..he does whatever the hell he wants....AGAIN
Trump is doing exactly what he wanted despite a Supreme Court ruling...
Trying to be done...
Try reading the ruling.
Re: US Politics Thread
mitchejw wrote:mitchejw wrote:Doesn’t Trumps moving forward with DACA removal prove more executive overreach?
Even when the Supreme Court rules..he does whatever the hell he wants....AGAIN
Trump is doing exactly what he wanted despite a Supreme Court ruling...
Trying to be done...
Try reading the ruling.
I just tried telling you i did...I’m saying i don’t see much difference between what the SC rules against and what he’s going ahead and doing anyway.
Seems pretty clear to me. He was banking on a Supreme Court validation and when he didn’t get it he just went ahead and did what he wanted anyway. Or is at least beginning to.
Re: US Politics Thread
buzzsaw wrote:mitchejw wrote:Trump is doing exactly what he wanted despite a Supreme Court ruling...
Trying to be done...
Try reading the ruling.
I just tried telling you i did...I’m saying i don’t see much difference between what the SC rules against and what he’s going ahead and doing anyway.
Seems pretty clear to me. He was banking on a Supreme Court validation and when he didn’t get it he just went ahead and did what he wanted anyway. Or is at least beginning to.
If you read the ruling, we wouldn't be having this discussion...or the last one.
Or you're just being willfully obtuse and trolling.
Re: US Politics Thread
Never mind...not doing homework for someone that will ignore it.
They have the right to repeal mitch, they just didn't follow correct procedures. In other words its a technicality.
When did i ever dispute that?
And it seems as though taking this thing to the Supreme Court was a waste of time.
