You are not logged in. Please register or login.

mitchejw
 Rep: 131 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:

I woke up today and thought...hmmm...maybe Trump needs more GOLDMAN SACHS representation in his cabinet.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ri … 41fac7197a

Trump simply should not have run for president if he's worried about losing value/money.

PaSnow
 Rep: 205 

Re: US Politics Thread

PaSnow wrote:

Pretty interesting stats:

http://www.philly.com/philly/infographi … 39245.html

I would paste but it's a table/chart & doesn't paste properly.


*Philadelphia Inquirer

mitchejw
 Rep: 131 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:

Getting right to work on repealing Obamacare - gutted that while pres-existing condition thing too...

Why is tho okay with everyone? or is it?

This seems so reckless...

mitchejw
 Rep: 131 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:
PaSnow wrote:

Pretty interesting stats:

http://www.philly.com/philly/infographi … 39245.html

I would paste but it's a table/chart & doesn't paste properly.

Watch RF and SG dismantle it and view only the negative aspects of that chart and use it to be critical.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

I thought this was a really good article.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/01/11/f … eport.com/

Thiel is such a cock. Basically, he doesn't believe a thing Trump spouts, but he's great. Go build your man made island for billionaires so you don't have to pay taxes yet influence our elections, fucking asshat.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/opin … share&_r=0

Randall Flagg
 Rep: 139 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:
PaSnow wrote:

Pretty interesting stats:

http://www.philly.com/philly/infographi … 39245.html

I would paste but it's a table/chart & doesn't paste properly.

Watch RF and SG dismantle it and view only the negative aspects of that chart and use it to be critical.


Haha, so it shouldn't be taken in total.  Just identify the positive and ignore everything else.

Ok, I'll play. 

The article tries to show that the median income has risen under Obama, going from 52k in 2008 to 56k in 2016.  Sounds reasonable and you all applaud.   Until you realize that accounting for inflation (which that article didn't do), the median income in 2008 is 58.3k in 2016 dollars. So it actually dropped by 2k. 

But since you've already decided there is no room for discussion, I don't need to address any more.

mitchejw
 Rep: 131 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
mitchejw wrote:
PaSnow wrote:

Pretty interesting stats:

http://www.philly.com/philly/infographi … 39245.html

I would paste but it's a table/chart & doesn't paste properly.

Watch RF and SG dismantle it and view only the negative aspects of that chart and use it to be critical.


Haha, so it shouldn't be taken in total.  Just identify the positive and ignore everything else.

I already know you see know positive in it

Randall Flagg
 Rep: 139 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
mitchejw wrote:

Watch RF and SG dismantle it and view only the negative aspects of that chart and use it to be critical.


Haha, so it shouldn't be taken in total.  Just identify the positive and ignore everything else.

I already know you see know positive in it


I updated my post in the 2 minutes between your reply, but I made no such claim that there are no positives in it nor from Obama's presidency.

mitchejw
 Rep: 131 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:

Omg look! Obama has deported 2.7 million people while Bush only deported a flat 2 million.

I'm going to willingly choose to overlook it though because doesn't fit my angry anti-liberal narrative.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB