You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: Ghostbusters III (Murray is IN!)
Good god not Steve Carell. I thought Ghostbusters III was going to be an animated movie, least thats what I heard with the original cast doing the voice acting. I say if they want to make more Ghostbusters movies remake the first two. The special effects were terrible back then, and with todays technology it could be a hell of a lot better. But I wouldn't be keen on getting a new cast and the old cast is well...too old to do it now. No one could replace Bill Murray, but if they plan on doing this, they better find a damn good replacement.
- Me_Wise_Magic
- Rep: 70
Re: Ghostbusters III (Murray is IN!)
It's going to suck without the full cast and especially Murray's involvement. They are just making the film to squeeze more money outta the brand and not for the fans who loved the series.
Re: Ghostbusters III (Murray is IN!)
Ugh. I'm not paying to watch old Dan Akroyd and Harold Ramis crack out bad jokes while Michael Cera and Jonah Hill are trying to potraying younger ghostbusters.
Murray's probably right on skipping this shit. Even though he did do two Garfield films for whatever reason.
Re: Ghostbusters III (Murray is IN!)
Couldn't say it any better than this really.
[b]
It’s still hard to be too enthusiastic about the film, although we’ll happily be proved wrong. It just feels like a project happening for the wrong reasons. We’ll wait and see how it turns out…
- Me_Wise_Magic
- Rep: 70
Re: Ghostbusters III (Murray is IN!)
I totally agree on not having Murray. I also loved that idea Murray had about being a ghost.
It'll take a miracle to make the franchise succeed without Bill.
I'm sure he could of found a way to pull that ghost role off if the studio executed properly. I'm already losing interest day by day as this gets made without the full team.
Re: Ghostbusters III (Murray is IN!)
I think it would be a big mistake on Bill's part to do it anyways, especially now at this stage of his career. Not because of his age but because, he has completely reinvented himself as an actor, thriving in more dramatic based roles, and at the ripe old age of 62, in 2012, that is quite an accomplishment. I say props to him to for staying away. No matter how good (or bad) Ghostbusters 3 is, the GB legacy is already set in stone. Don't fuck with it. Let the franchise R.I.P. (pun intended)
- Me_Wise_Magic
- Rep: 70
Re: Ghostbusters III (Murray is IN!)
I think it would be a big mistake on Bill's part to do it anyways, especially now at this stage of his career. Not because of his age but because, he has completely reinvented himself as an actor, thriving in more dramatic based roles, and at the ripe old age of 62, in 2012, that is quite an accomplishment. I say props to him to for staying away. No matter how good (or bad) Ghostbusters 3 is, the GB legacy is already set in stone. Don't fuck with it. Let the franchise R.I.P. (pun intended)
THIS!
