You are not logged in. Please register or login.

buzzsaw
 Rep: 423 

Re: Serious question

buzzsaw wrote:

But it's ok when the only comeback to anything negative about Axl is "insert Slash insult here"??  That has to work both ways.  You can't be anti Slash or Axl completely if you love Guns N' Roses.  It really is that simple.  You can prefer one or not like what one or both did, but you have to respect both of them for their contributions to the band.

RussTCB
 Rep: 633 

Re: Serious question

RussTCB wrote:

removed

James
 Rep: 664 

Re: Serious question

James wrote:

Yeah, but does there need to be a GNR truth police that monitors Slash 24/7? You would think there are bigger fish to fry, like something called Chinese Democracy.

No wonder Bumblefoot is now starting solo projects. He doesn't want to sit around and think about Slash all day.

RussTCB
 Rep: 633 

Re: Serious question

RussTCB wrote:

removed

Neemo
 Rep: 485 

Re: Serious question

Neemo wrote:

of course the book is biased...its slash's version of what happened...doesnt make it wrong or any thing, its his story in his words....as for fudged dates....I'm surprised Slash remembers anything at all 16 ...didn;t he even say that he had trouble remembering some things while scribbling stuff down? Slash isnt a GnR nerd like us, he lived it...a year or so either way  on facts is pointless to him, it happened and he was cool enough to get it down to tell us about that period of his life

19

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB