You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin
As long as my ENEMIES are down with nuclear weapons, i'll be down with them.
So if they have Nukes you want to nuke them. Nuclear weapons are the worst thing to ever be invented. If you nuke them someone will nuke you.
I mean from what I understand your mentality is if they have nuclear weapons we got to kill them but if you have nukes it's all fine.
Re: Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin
Anyone who agrees with using nuclear weapons doesn't deserve a vote on anything.
There are most certainly scenarios where nuclear weapons should be used by the United States.
A North Korean invasion of South Korea
A Chinese invasion of Taiwan
Retaliation for a biological, chemical, or nuclear attack on the US.
ANY invasion by foreign troops on US soil.
Retaliation for an invasion/strike on Canada
Defending the NATO alliance from Russia
Defending Japan from any invasion.
Retaliation for attempting to disrupt US satellites and/or other communications.
We also reserve the right for a preemptive nuclear strike on any country for any reason whatsoever.
Re: Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin
Axlin08 wrote:Good interview by Palin. The biggest thing people like about her is she's not "Washington". She's an outsider.
This just gives her more creedence. If Israel decides to take out Iran, then they have my blessing. Iran ain't nothin' but towel wrappin' jew haters anyways, and if Iran makes one counter back, we'll go in with our nuclear arms. No problem with it whatsoever. It's time Islamic facism was wiped off the face of the earth. No different than the Nazis. Same goes for Lebanon.
So we should basically nuke an entire country where most of the people in the country are perfectly normal fine peaceful people because they might have a few racist, extremists. I mean in your country of America I'm pretty sure there must be a few fundamental extremists from many religions. We gonna nuke every US state to get rid of them?
Anyone who agrees with using nuclear weapons doesn't deserve a vote on anything. I mean you call Iran "jew haters" but just before it make a racist remark by calling them "towel wrappers". That's deregotary. I have a friend who is Iranian, his mother's Iranian and almost all of his relatives are. Are you suggesting I go and kill them. Here's some news for you. They are all about as left wing as you can get and none of them are
towel wrappin' jew haters
Grow up.
I need to grow up? I NEED TO GROW UP?
Are you kidding?
I come from a country that's NOT anti-semetic. I come from a country that provides WOMEN rights. I come from a country that doesn't persecute people because of their religion or kill them because they aren't the right religion. I come from a country that provides MINORITES rights. I come from a country that a GAY man or GAY woman can at least walk down the street (hopefully get married one day), but we're getting there.
AND I NEED TO GROW UP?
That's fuckin' rich. All those cats that don't provide those things, in any of those countries, and still live like it's 50 years ago, and in some places 500... you'll have to excuse me if the word RAG HEAD slips out now and again.
Re: Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin
Lets tone down the racial innuendos please. I know you don't mean that as a personal attack on all "rag heads", but I know for a fact from looking at this site's statistics each month that some of our lurkers are based in Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Dubai, and Turkey.
Re: Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin
[
I need to grow up? I NEED TO GROW UP?Are you kidding?
I come from a country that's NOT anti-semetic. I come from a country that provides WOMEN rights. I come from a country that doesn't persecute people because of their religion or kill them because they aren't the right religion. I come from a country that provides MINORITES rights. I come from a country that a GAY man or GAY woman can at least walk down the street (hopefully get married one day), but we're getting there.
AND I NEED TO GROW UP?
That's fuckin' rich. All those cats that don't provide those things, in any of those countries, and still live like it's 50 years ago, and in some places 500... you'll have to excuse me if the word RAG HEAD slips out now and again.
I said you need to grow up because you seem to harbour a bit too much unjust hatred towards the Middle East and that you think nuking countries is a great idea. I can understand doing it in situations like James suggested where it may be the only option left to end a war quickly so that the focus can return to reparing all countires affected. Although I don't like the idea that a country like the US has the right to nuke anyone when they feel like 
Re: Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin
As for Palin, Charlie Gibson is a biased douche that HARDBALLED Palin (pardon the expression) in one the most obviously SEXIST tones and inflection-driven interviews ever. Gibson treated her like she was a dumb chick that he would walk right over, and she gave back as good as she got.
Quit complaining and call a wahhhhmbulance. Gibson's a teddy bear & was for Palin also. It's not his fault she didn't know the issues that are logical to most national politicians. The three questions that ruined her were:
What is your opinion of the Bush Doctrine: {She needed to be asked 3 times before she even answered it, whether or not you agree with if she knew what it was. [NOT]}
Do you have foriegn policy experience: {Where she answered she can see Russia from Alaska and that oil counts as foreign policy experience}
Is the Iraq War God's Will
You ask Joe Biden any of those 3 questions he answers it with ease. (And you don't need to ask him #3 because he didn't say that or that it is "God's Will to put a pipeline in Alaska"). It's not SEXISM?? She's just unqualified.
Re: Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin
Axlin08 wrote:As for Palin, Charlie Gibson is a biased douche that HARDBALLED Palin (pardon the expression) in one the most obviously SEXIST tones and inflection-driven interviews ever. Gibson treated her like she was a dumb chick that he would walk right over, and she gave back as good as she got.
Quit complaining and call a wahhhhmbulance. Gibson's a teddy bear & was for Palin also. It's not his fault she didn't know the issues that are logical to most national politicians. The three questions that ruined her were:
What is your opinion of the Bush Doctrine: {She needed to be asked 3 times before she even answered it, whether or not you agree with if she knew what it was. [NOT]}
Do you have foriegn policy experience: {Where she answered she can see Russia from Alaska and that oil counts as foreign policy experience}
Why are we forgetting the facts on this issue again? The guy who invented the term has admitted himself that there are several aspects of the doctrine and that it was a loaded question. If someone asks you a general question with zero detail, aren't you going to ask for a clarification or are you psychic?
Why are you bitching about a VP nominee having a lack of foreign policy experience? Only foreign policy experience Clinton had was protesting the Vietnam War in Russia.
Oh yeah, Clinton was prez. I forgot that since Obama has such a thin resume, we're only supposed to concentrate on VPs throughout history.
