You are not logged in. Please register or login.

James
 Rep: 664 

Re: Differences in the "old" new leaks....

James wrote:
buzzsaw wrote:

As for Riyadh, I'll turn the question around:  How does it have depth?

You answer my question with a question?

I listen to a lot of great music that Slash doesn't appear on.  This has nothing to do with him at all.

Sure it does. Nine tracks just leaked, and in your 2nd post on the subject you were already bringing up AFD without mentioning anything in detail regarding the CD songs.


Did you really expect another AFD from a band whose members are approaching fifty?

Might sound like Jarmo when I say this, but.......





Its not 1987 anymore.

Neemo
 Rep: 485 

Re: Differences in the "old" new leaks....

Neemo wrote:

guaranteed that nearly every review that we hear on the new album will mention Slash in some capacity

its a simple fact that Slash will be mentioned in a GnR review...Axl kept the name hes gotta expect it to happen

James
 Rep: 664 

Re: Differences in the "old" new leaks....

James wrote:

I'm not denying that Slash or the old band wont be brought up, but I at least expect more from a review than "boo hoo, Slash isn't on it. These songs suck."

Re: Differences in the "old" new leaks....

Sky Dog wrote:

I like all nine songs and am very happy. To each his own Buzz.:butt: My only issue is Axl's voice is a bit high on If The World and #2.

Neemo
 Rep: 485 

Re: Differences in the "old" new leaks....

Neemo wrote:

well i think #2 & #3 suck 16

and its not because slash isnt there....its cuz the songs are shitty 14

PaSnow
 Rep: 205 

Re: Differences in the "old" new leaks....

PaSnow wrote:
madagas wrote:

My only issue is Axl's voice is a bit high on If The World and #2.

"A bit high"??!  It sounds worse than two cats fucking on a chalkboard!!

Re: Differences in the "old" new leaks....

Sky Dog wrote:

nice.....but leave my cat out of this!!!!!:laugh:

PaSnow
 Rep: 205 

Re: Differences in the "old" new leaks....

PaSnow wrote:

Listening to TWAT right now, interesting first 10 seconds.. was that there before?? It's only 10 seconds, but still, I'm just sayin...

PaSnow
 Rep: 205 

Re: Differences in the "old" new leaks....

PaSnow wrote:

The Blues is great, has alot of potential. If the album is really with the label they should put this on a movie soundtrack. Would've rocked for Batman. They'd make a shitload of $$ by then having it on iTunes.

buzzsaw
 Rep: 423 

Re: Differences in the "old" new leaks....

buzzsaw wrote:
James Lofton wrote:

I'm not denying that Slash or the old band wont be brought up, but I at least expect more from a review than "boo hoo, Slash isn't on it. These songs suck."

That's not at all what I said.  However it is interesting that you make that comment while you're on record as saying that without BH these songs suck.  Interesting double standard.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB