You are not logged in. Please register or login.

tejastech08
 Rep: 194 

Re: Larry Sinclair...

tejastech08 wrote:

http://www.whitehouse.com/

There's 3 outcomes to this:

1. He's telling the truth.
2. He's lying.
3. He's crazy so he can't fail a polygraph test, which means Barack would need to take one and if he passes, then it's obvious Larry Sinclair is crazy.

A reporter in Chicago investigated the guy and said that he was institutionalized at the time he claimed this incident happened.

polluxlm
 Rep: 221 

Re: Larry Sinclair...

polluxlm wrote:

Wouldn't surprise me one bit. High office got an extreme perversion rate. They're like priests.

tejastech08
 Rep: 194 

Re: Larry Sinclair...

tejastech08 wrote:
polluxlm wrote:

Wouldn't surprise me one bit. High office got an extreme perversion rate. They're like priests.

It's not the sex part that he is calling him out on. It's the drug claims. Obama has admitted to drug use when he was a teenager but has said he has never done them as an adult.

I've donated $25 to Obama and voted for him here in the Texas primary. If this turns out to be true, it'd become pretty humorous. I'd definitely never trust another politician again. I don't trust McCain and I don't trust Clinton, but Obama felt like someone trustworthy. We'll see what happens, but if it is true, he will likely be the most ashamed public official in modern U.S. history; even worse than Nixon.

James
 Rep: 664 

Re: Larry Sinclair...

James wrote:

Yeah, if this story has legs his campaign is in a bit of trouble. While this country seems to have no problem with drug use or bisexuality, this goes completely against what Obama stands for.

bigbri
 Rep: 341 

Re: Larry Sinclair...

bigbri wrote:

Bunk. And already proved wrong by a reporter in Chicago as Tejastech stated. I don't have the article. Search for it.

Communist China
 Rep: 130 

Re: Larry Sinclair...

BS. Don't believe everything you read.

bigbri
 Rep: 341 

Re: Larry Sinclair...

bigbri wrote:
Communist China wrote:

BS. Don't believe everything you read.

Exactly. Probably doing the Clintons' dirty work anyhow. The Clintons think they are entitled to the White House again, and it's just getting sickening.

Hillary is gonna pull out lots of sick tricks and mud before the March 4 primary. I guarantee it. Just wait. We'll see something this week, perhaps it'll be this story with them commenting on it.

tejastech08
 Rep: 194 

Re: Larry Sinclair...

tejastech08 wrote:

Whitehouse.com seems to be stringing people along. At first they claimed they would release the results of one expert's analysis at 12 PM EDT today. Then they said that the second expert's results would be back soon so they would just wait and release them both between 1 and 1:30 PM EDT. Yet here it is almost 1:50 PM EDT and no update. At the very least, they are stringing people along to get more hits from people hitting the refresh button. And of course, this Sinclair fellow himself is getting paid just to take the test even if he fails.

tejastech08
 Rep: 194 

Re: Larry Sinclair...

tejastech08 wrote:

Deception detected by the first polygraph expert. This story should now be a non-issue. Hell yeah. It's amazing how desperate Hillary and the right wing are to tear down a guy that has the potential to do some incredible things for us, particularly with regard to our reputation overseas thanks to his diverse background (including his ehtnicity AND the very diverse places he has lived growing up).

bigbri
 Rep: 341 

Re: Larry Sinclair...

bigbri wrote:

Well, it's no surprise the guy failed, since the story has already pretty much been proven false.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB