You are not logged in. Please register or login.

bigbri
 Rep: 341 

Re: 270 to win 2020 Edition

bigbri wrote:

Actually Trump wouldn’t win that scenario even with Texas and Pa.

James
 Rep: 664 

Re: 270 to win 2020 Edition

James wrote:

He'd have 283 electoral votes on your map if including Texas and PA.

Edit

You're right. It includes the votes already even if not dark red.

mitchejw
 Rep: 131 

Re: 270 to win 2020 Edition

mitchejw wrote:

[img]<div align="center"><a href="https://www.270towin.com/maps/keNon"><img src="https://www.270towin.com/map-images/keNon.png" width="800"></a><br><small><img style="vertical-align:middle;" src="https://www.270towin.com/uploads/3rd_party_270_30px.png" alt="" /> Click the map to create your own at <a href="https://www.270towin.com/maps/keNon">270toWin.com</a></small></div>[/img]

I don't know what I did wrong here.

PaSnow
 Rep: 205 

Re: 270 to win 2020 Edition

PaSnow wrote:
mitchejw wrote:

[img]<div align="center"><a href="https://www.270towin.com/maps/keNon"><img src="https://www.270towin.com/map-images/keNon.png" width="800"></a><br><small><img style="vertical-align:middle;" src="https://www.270towin.com/uploads/3rd_party_270_30px.png" alt="" /> Click the map to create your own at <a href="https://www.270towin.com/maps/keNon">270toWin.com</a></small></div>[/img]

I don't know what I did wrong here.

This?
keNon.png

PaSnow
 Rep: 205 

Re: 270 to win 2020 Edition

PaSnow wrote:

Just grab the url, https:// www. 270towin.com/maps/keNon. png

and insert it within [ img ] [/img  ] tags

James
 Rep: 664 

Re: 270 to win 2020 Edition

James wrote:

My final map.

7kVYW.png

Re: 270 to win 2020 Edition

After not PMing anyone on here in about a year (and not posting on the forum in almost a decade), I just went through hell to figure out my password and say that I love the political threads on this site. When chaos breaks out, this is one of my first stops for uncensored opposing opinions, and I always end up lurking a few days afterward. James is absolutely right about Reddit being full of partisan cheerleaders. I didn't realize how much I enjoyed the bickering on here until decided to give politics on there a shot. Eesh.

Speaking of James: You're too much, man. With your map, alternate map, and updated map. It's like Bobby Heenan picking a winner for the Royal Rumble. 14

I've got Biden winning 327 to 211. But, every swing state he takes, I figure it'll be by a hair. hmm

Have a fun election, people. Stay safe out there.

Re: 270 to win 2020 Edition

AtariLegend wrote:

None of my business, but I hope James you didn't vote for that shit show.

Hope you all make it through the week whatever happens. Good luck to Evo's Americans.

mitchejw
 Rep: 131 

Re: 270 to win 2020 Edition

mitchejw wrote:
mindsmack51883 wrote:

After not PMing anyone on here in about a year (and not posting on the forum in almost a decade), I just went through hell to figure out my password and say that I love the political threads on this site. When chaos breaks out, this is one of my first stops for uncensored opposing opinions, and I always end up lurking a few days afterward. James is absolutely right about Reddit being full of partisan cheerleaders. I didn't realize how much I enjoyed the bickering on here until decided to give politics on there a shot. Eesh.

Speaking of James: You're too much, man. With your map, alternate map, and updated map. It's like Bobby Heenan picking a winner for the Royal Rumble. 14

I've got Biden winning 327 to 211. But, every swing state he takes, I figure it'll be by a hair. hmm

Have a fun election, people. Stay safe out there.

I have never spent one second on reddit...I didn't realize politics was a thing on there...

James
 Rep: 664 

Re: 270 to win 2020 Edition

James wrote:

Hey mindsmack....good to see a lurker weighing in. Awhile back someone in the political threads asked me if it was just our small group participating here. I told them there's more people just reading it than there are posters. It gets tons of page views.

Years ago any political news/threads would show up really high on generic Google searches and I've always believed this is how we kept a political audience watching.

I can see why. It's always between 5-20 members posting and small numbers like that make it more natural and easy to read for lurkers.

The arguing is probably entertaining for lurkers although it obviously gets out of hand unfortunately.

Plus it's a quirky cast of characters.

Atari....I held my nose and voted Biden but mark my words.... it's gonna be a shit show either way.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB