You are not logged in. Please register or login.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:

Republicans are afraid to go on her show, and when they do I think she's very fair. I don't think you can watch FOX and then complain about biasness tongue

Re: US Politics Thread

AtariLegend wrote:

Your President elect...


PaSnow
 Rep: 205 

Re: US Politics Thread

PaSnow wrote:
Smoking Guns wrote:
misterID wrote:

Holy cow, Kellyanne Conway was on Rachael Maddow tonight and the conflicts of interest, the ethics violations of Trump's cabinet nominees, and surgical precision of destroying Flynn was amazing. It literally looked like Conway never knew any of the issues behind these nominees. Price I give her a pass because she just learned about his shenanigans as it just came out today.


Maddow could be one of the best if she didn't just focus on republicans. She is very intelligent but is so biased I can't really handle her anymore. Contrast that with Chris Matthews who seems much more objective to me.

Yeah I agree with this.  She's too left & has an agenda the whole show. Quit watching her & having much interest in what she says. Being more partial to both (and criticizing the Dems more) would prolly be a smart move, but hey if its working for her I suppose don't change a thing. On a reverse level I like Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday (broadcast Fox, not cable).

The Kellyanne Conway interview does sound interesting. I don't buy her, I think she's somewhat smart, but not THAT intelligent.

polluxlm
 Rep: 221 

Re: US Politics Thread

polluxlm wrote:

She did run a successful campaign, so she's probably pretty talented. Only woman to do so isn't she?

PaSnow
 Rep: 205 

Re: US Politics Thread

PaSnow wrote:
polluxlm wrote:

She did run a successful campaign, so she's probably pretty talented. Only woman to do so isn't she?

Did she "run" it?  Or was she the spokesperson for it?!

Smoking Guns
 Rep: 330 

Re: US Politics Thread

Smoking Guns wrote:

Kelly Anne could have unleashed a laundry list of shady shit on the Dems and Maddow would have said blah blah blah... she is good when on the attack but since she hardly ever questions Dems she is losing a lot of cred. Even Bill O'Rielly is more objective and he critiqued Trump throughout the election.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:
Smoking Guns wrote:

Kelly Anne could have unleashed a laundry list of shady shit on the Dems and Maddow would have said blah blah blah... she is good when on the attack but since she hardly ever questions Dems she is losing a lot of cred. Even Bill O'Rielly is more objective and he critiqued Trump throughout the election.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

So Kelly just decided to play softball with her??

Smoking Guns
 Rep: 330 

Re: US Politics Thread

Smoking Guns wrote:
misterID wrote:
Smoking Guns wrote:

Kelly Anne could have unleashed a laundry list of shady shit on the Dems and Maddow would have said blah blah blah... she is good when on the attack but since she hardly ever questions Dems she is losing a lot of cred. Even Bill O'Rielly is more objective and he critiqued Trump throughout the election.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

So Kelly just decided to play softball with her??

Well Kellyanne was being interviewed about Trump. So she doesn't need to deflect. Just pointing out all interviewers sound like badasses when on the attack and don't have to answer for their heros. Chris Hayes is just as bad.... as is Lawerence O'Donnel. Stephanie Ruhel (sp) is pretty decent. Tamryn Hall is awful. Joy Reid is not only biased but extremely stupid. Minka on Morning Joe is fair as fuck. Sean Hannity is the most like Hayes and Maddow on Fox but even he will call out silly things republicans do.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:

Maddow didn't attack her at all. Did you watch the interview? She tore apart nearly every nominee he has for his cabinet and she represents Trump and couldnt answer some big issues Rachel brought up. And she does call out Democrats, so I don't know where that comes from. I thought she did a segment that was majorly disrespectful towards Claire McCaskill, but she did show respect by bringing her on her next show and allowing her to defend herself and push back.

Smoking Guns
 Rep: 330 

Re: US Politics Thread

Smoking Guns wrote:
misterID wrote:

Maddow didn't attack her at all. Did you watch the interview? She tore apart nearly every nominee he has for his cabinet and she represents Trump and couldnt answer some big issues Rachel brought up. And she does call out Democrats, so I don't know where that comes from. I thought she did a segment that was majorly disrespectful towards Claire McCaskill, but she did show respect by bringing her on her next show and allowing her to defend herself and push back.

Post link to interview.  I will watch. I see Maddow often.  Like I said, she is very intelligent, but far from fair. I saw her have Rick Santorum on once and the whole interview she basically blasted him for not being pro gay enough.  The first time she had Kelly Anne on she said a couple token compliment then went after Trump hard. Which is fine, I expect it. But it is quite predictable.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB