You are not logged in. Please register or login.

Smoking Guns
 Rep: 330 

Re: US Politics Thread

Smoking Guns wrote:

Best commercial ever.

mitchejw
 Rep: 130 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

Your party's entire platform is predicated on race and identifying arbitrary differences to make people "special".   You come in this forum and post some sob story about an exchange student who may or may not have been harmed because of his ethnicity.  But remain absolutely mum when 30 people of color are butchered in your own city every week.  You guys try to claim we can't define your silence, but we don't need to.  What you feel obligated to comment on is a direct line into what you find important.   The hypocrisy and double standards to which you feign moral outrage says it all. 

Your party doesn't give a fuck about poor whites in Appalachia.  Jim Webb brought this up in the first primary debate and was mocked for it.  The war on poverty has resulted in your adopted community having a less than 50% high school graduation rate and 70% out of wedlock births - more than any other demographic.  So yes, you're not interested in actual results in policy, but what aligns with your unqualified white guilt.  Your party has accomplished nothing but celebrating ignorance and keeping those least advantaged enslaved to government assistance programs.  If people of color can't achieve equality on their merits and achievements alone, then maybe it's time they abandon the moronic belief systems that tell them they can live free of consequence?

It's not the party that showed me the "differences" between people. You can call the differences "arbitrary" if you want to....but whatever. You speak in the abstract and you keep trying to put me in the position of defending your inferences.

Your idea that this country should solely be filled with war mongering assholes who only seem to validated if they're killing someone of another country/culture/belief system/color sounds a lot like all the countries that you ridicule. Are you in support of Russia's efforts to take over countries that surround them? It seems like you should be....the superior Russia waving its dick around as they take the weak, inferior and probably faggy liberal countries who are just not strong enough to defend themselves seems like something you should support.

EXCEPT....this is the perfect time for 'Murica to take its shirt off, take out it's gun and blow back Russia into its inferior status from 'Murica....thus once again proving the cycle of life....the whole macho manly system is predicated on every backing down to the all mighty 'Murica. But that faggy, pussy Obama decided that a war on the other side of the world over ideas of machismo and 'Muricain made ideas of....well....'Murican superiority and flexing muscles and shootin' guns n' stuff. Sounds like that long, grueling, little skirmish that went on between 1960 to 1975....real succesful venture for us....just like operation Iraqi freedom. There was a whole country of people DEPENDENT on the government to establish/maintain FREEEEEEDOM!!!! Sounds like a buncha pussy fuckin' liberals if you ask me...


YEEEEEE HAWWW!!!!


Are you done with story time?  I believe in everyone working together and playing by the rules.  If you want western technology and want access to our markets, play by our rules.   If you act up like Sadam and threaten stability, you get smacked.  That doesn't mean you enter our countries and declare them yours now.  That's threatening the stability.  It's called putting a line in the sand and sending military assets to stand their ground.  I don't want to go to war with anyone.  Been there, done that.  It's not fun.  But you forget that this wonderful society didn't just manifest itself into existence.  Our grandfathers and great grandfathers built this country and made it the superpower it is today.  They sacrificed for it.  Men and women sacrifice for it today by volunteering to suit up and go wherever their country tells them to go so other people know it's not okay to come here and knock down and take what we've built.  Men and women are creating business and new ideas that better our society.  Everyone else is just a bystander taking advantage of what the others have sacrificed to maintain.  Where do you fit in to the equation?

You come across as someone who's never taken a stand for anything or ever stood up for yourself. Did the jocks flick you in the ear and call you a 'faggot'? At least that's what I hear when you automatically assume every military action is a dick measuring contest.   Some jocks flicked me in the ear and called me a 'faggot' too.  But I smacked them in the mouth and they all of a sudden weren't as bold.  I'm not saying nor have I ever advocated a military response to every infraction.  But Chirst, if you're not willing to get smacked in the mouth when someone is trying to come in your house and fuck your wife, when is it appropriate?

I was on the high school hockey team....littlest guy on the team...not in height maybe (5'9")...but I weighed maybe 115....

I used to do all the rich kids with all of the state of the art equipment wouldn't do. I'd go into the corners and get my ass beat down. Then I started asking myself why...why was I doing this for the "team"?

I hated my teammates. They were pricks to me. So I dunno if that made me the jock or the pussy. I did things no one else wanted to though...

Smoking Guns
 Rep: 330 

Re: US Politics Thread

Smoking Guns wrote:

HOLY FUCK. FOVAL IS CALLING MOTHER FUCKERS OUT AND CONFIRMING THE VIDEOS.

https://twitter.com/scott_foval

THIS IS GLORIOUS.

twitter.com/scott_foval

Smoking Guns
 Rep: 330 

Re: US Politics Thread

Smoking Guns wrote:

Talking about who he paid. Saying Trump protestors and black lives matter protestors are the same folks etc.

misterID
 Rep: 475 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:

I think I've fallen in love with the hot Asian chick above Trump's shoulder.

misterID
 Rep: 475 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:
Smoking Guns wrote:

Randall has dominated the past 2 pages. And he voted for Hillary. Difference between Randall and the HRC voters is he calls out the bullshit while you guys find no issues and immediately talk about Trump. There is only one truly corrupt person running for president. Only one!! Hillary R. Clinton is maybe the most corrupt person to ever run for the Oval Office. Obama was a goof, but was not corrupt. Trump pretty much has a clean record except maybe Trump U and saying stupid shit. But the Clinton foundation started for one reason only, corruption.

You've taken ignorant to a whole other level. You obviously haven't read the last two pages. I give Randall credit that he is a conservative but refuses to drop to his knees and blow Trump, not like the Trump jizz gurgling I've seen here.

Smoking Guns
 Rep: 330 

Re: US Politics Thread

Smoking Guns wrote:
misterID wrote:

I think I've fallen in love with the hot Asian chick above Trump's shoulder.

I was eying the blonde in he lower left. Hahaha. Funny. Kind of cheesy she toted out all these "celebs".

Smoking Guns
 Rep: 330 

Re: US Politics Thread

Smoking Guns wrote:
misterID wrote:
Smoking Guns wrote:

Randall has dominated the past 2 pages. And he voted for Hillary. Difference between Randall and the HRC voters is he calls out the bullshit while you guys find no issues and immediately talk about Trump. There is only one truly corrupt person running for president. Only one!! Hillary R. Clinton is maybe the most corrupt person to ever run for the Oval Office. Obama was a goof, but was not corrupt. Trump pretty much has a clean record except maybe Trump U and saying stupid shit. But the Clinton foundation started for one reason only, corruption.

You've taken ignorant to a whole other level. You obviously haven't read the last two pages. I give Randall credit that he is a conservative but refuses to drop to his knees and blow Trump, not like the Trump jizz gurgling I've seen here.

Lol. What about this FOVAL cat?

misterID
 Rep: 475 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

Isn't it obvious?  America's military position and status as the sole superpower. Russia took over parts of Georgia in 2008 amidst the oncoming election between Obama and McCain. Obama took a "ahh shucks, Russia isn't a threat" theme which he continued into 2012. McCain ran the opposite making his famous "when I look into Putin's eyes I see 'KGB'" argument during the debates and advocating for an American response. Obama did nothing. Romney echoed the sentiment in 2012 to which Obama mocked him about talking about Calvary in the 19th century. Russia then takes Crimea.  Not to mention Obama's failed Middle East policy that allowed not only ISIS to form, but to bring Russian military into the Middle East as a military force again.

China is creating fake islands and is now taking over our relationship with the Philippines, which is our primary asset in South East Asia.  If we lose that site, our entire pacific fleet and force projection is dramatically handicapped.  Oh, and that crazy North Korea country having nukes and missles capable of hitting the west coast.

12 years ago there wasn't a country in the world who questioned our supremacy. Now we have every third rate leader acting up because they no longer fear quick and swift retaliation. That's what's always killed me about some of you. You still don't realize this is a high stakes game and the US has to smack the gnats occasionally to remind everyone we can.

So yeah. I think Obama's leadership has greatly hindered our strength globally. And that is to say nothing of our reduced ownership of our own businesses and economic power/influence abroad.

Are you saying we needed to start a war with Russia? Europe needs to deal with that shit. But I do give Romney and McCain credit, Russia is a threat, but Trump doesn't think so, right SG?
Sorry, Isis didn't start because of Obama. I know W. in't responsible for anything, and just ignoring it goes back to W.'s war, but this is a an outright lie. W signed and set the date for that withdrawal. And the seeds of Isis started in 2002.

I also don't see what your solution is for China and North Korea. Smack them like gnats?

misterID
 Rep: 475 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:
Smoking Guns wrote:
misterID wrote:
Smoking Guns wrote:

Randall has dominated the past 2 pages. And he voted for Hillary. Difference between Randall and the HRC voters is he calls out the bullshit while you guys find no issues and immediately talk about Trump. There is only one truly corrupt person running for president. Only one!! Hillary R. Clinton is maybe the most corrupt person to ever run for the Oval Office. Obama was a goof, but was not corrupt. Trump pretty much has a clean record except maybe Trump U and saying stupid shit. But the Clinton foundation started for one reason only, corruption.

You've taken ignorant to a whole other level. You obviously haven't read the last two pages. I give Randall credit that he is a conservative but refuses to drop to his knees and blow Trump, not like the Trump jizz gurgling I've seen here.

Lol. What about this FOVAL cat?

The guy who admitted to lying?

The blonde with the red hat? She looks really young. Cute, but looks like jailbait.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB