You are not logged in. Please register or login.

Rex
 Rep: 50 

Re: Kim Kardashian’s IMDB Bio Is AMAZING

Rex wrote:

Kim's got dat ass.  She's pretty fine.  The other ones, though...meh.

monkeychow
 Rep: 661 

Re: Kim Kardashian’s IMDB Bio Is AMAZING

monkeychow wrote:
russtcb wrote:

I've never ever understood how people could find Paris Hilton attractive either.

At least on a superficial level I'd say she's attractive...

It's hard to know what she's really like, I'm pretty sure most of her appearances on TV are a persona much like a WWE character of herself.

Looks wise I'm not much into the fake hair and heavy makeup look, but for people who find themselves attracted to slim girls she definitely has that thin thing going....I know thin bodies are a polarising thing with guys. Some love it, some hate it. I don't like the idea of girls starving themselves...but I will admit just physically when I meet thin girls I like the look...even if the ethics are bad...

I also respect that she tends to carry off a sexiness about herself without having to go and buy implants which most of the famous women of the world seem to do these days.

parisboobs.jpg

faldor
 Rep: 281 

Re: Kim Kardashian’s IMDB Bio Is AMAZING

faldor wrote:
buzzsaw wrote:
russtcb wrote:

I think all of the Kardashian women are just terribly unattractive but I can see why at least some people are attracted Kim. I've never ever understood how people could find Paris Hilton attractive either.

I thought one of them wasn't horrible, but I don't know who it was.  I still think Lamar married a guy.

Yeah, not a Chloe fan myself.  Kim is super hot at times.  Other times, her ass just looks way too huge.  I think Kourtney (the other one) looks pretty nice.  She seems like the most grounded and level headed of the bunch, from what little I've seen of the 3 of them.

kourtney-kardashian-maxim-india-6-475x631.jpg

-Jack-
 Rep: 40 

Re: Kim Kardashian’s IMDB Bio Is AMAZING

-Jack- wrote:

I would guess 50% of the people on IMDB could have equally bad things said about them. Making fun of Kim Kardashian is pretty questionable when society is the one that gives her any power, credibility, fame, etc. Kim Kardashian is stupid and talentless but that means society is st00pid as fuck lol.
EDIT: Not taking it super seriously or anything though, decently funny.

RussTCB
 Rep: 633 

Re: Kim Kardashian’s IMDB Bio Is AMAZING

RussTCB wrote:

removed

Axlin16
 Rep: 768 

Re: Kim Kardashian’s IMDB Bio Is AMAZING

Axlin16 wrote:

Kourtney hot?

No dice


Kourt without makeup

kourtney-kardashian-no-makeup.jpg


So HOT!               bleh, ugh.

Axlin16
 Rep: 768 

Re: Kim Kardashian’s IMDB Bio Is AMAZING

Axlin16 wrote:
russtcb wrote:

I think all of the Kardashian women are just terribly unattractive but I can see why at least some people are attracted Kim. I've never ever understood how people could find Paris Hilton attractive either.

This x a fuckin' million.


Never understood reality TV culture AT ALL. Don't find them pretty, find them disgusting consumerist pigs, everything wrong with women, and THE WORST example for young women. Then again, I guess i'm coming at it from a "grunge" perspective.

I'd rather my daughter at 13 be a fan of Tori Black than Kim Kardashian.

faldor
 Rep: 281 

Re: Kim Kardashian’s IMDB Bio Is AMAZING

faldor wrote:

Axlin, you are the king of the "worst picture with no makeup of any chick in the world".  You must have those all on file.  I'm sure there's one out there of Kate Upton or EVERY girl who's ever lived.

Axlin16
 Rep: 768 

Re: Kim Kardashian’s IMDB Bio Is AMAZING

Axlin16 wrote:

Dude I really don't do it to fuck with you man.

I think it's because mentally i'm the reverse. Yes I know we all look bad when we get up, we all take bad pics. Women have bad moments too.


But I think it's because I look for how a woman looks without makeup, or with less makeup FIRST, before I pull the "hot" card.

I'd have a hard time believing that Kate Upton looks much different without makeup. There's some chicks I know immediately off the top of my head that "glam out" for these Hollywood productions whether film, TV or Maxim shoot, and yet then you'll see them out at these jewerly parties with virtually no makeup on, looking like normal women... and they are SO MUCH better looking.

Not all of course, some women NEED makeup, but I love the girls where "less is more" is a good thing. Around the house they are super cute, and when they doll up they are a stunning beauty.


For example, Jesse Biel with little makeup:

jessica_biel400.jpg



To me, and my personal taste... Biel looks FARRRRR better on the right. Why? Because that's what she's gonna look like just hanging at the house in a t-shirt and jeans.

To me it's also the telling truth of "Hot or Not". Any chick that can still be pretty with the makeup scaled down, has 'truely got it going on'.



Just figured i'd explain where I was coming from, especially when I launched my brigade against Katy Perry. No offense intended. 16

faldor
 Rep: 281 

Re: Kim Kardashian’s IMDB Bio Is AMAZING

faldor wrote:

No offense taken, but let's be fair. That picture of Kourtney, her eyes are half closed and she's got a smirk on her face. That makes her look worse than the fact that she has no makeup on.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB